
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Priority areas for conservation alone are not a good proxy for predicting the impact of renewable energy expansion

There is broad consensus that increasing the use of renewable energies is effective to mitigate the global climate crisis. However, the development of renewables may carry environmental impacts, and their expansion could accelerate biodiversity loss (1). However, Dunnett et al. (2) have recently estimated a minimal overlap between renewable energy expansion and important conservation areas (ICAs;i.e., protected areas, key biodiversity areas, wilderness areas) (sensu ref. 2), suggesting that these infrastructures would not significantly affect biodiversity conservation if properly planned and regulated. Peer reviewed
Conservation of Natural Resources, WIND FARMS, BIRDS, CONSERVATION, Ecología, ENERGY, Environmental sciences, :5 - Ciencias puras y naturales::57 - Biología::574 - Ecología general y biodiversidad [CDU], https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6, Letters, Economic Development, Renewable Energy, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
Conservation of Natural Resources, WIND FARMS, BIRDS, CONSERVATION, Ecología, ENERGY, Environmental sciences, :5 - Ciencias puras y naturales::57 - Biología::574 - Ecología general y biodiversidad [CDU], https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6, Letters, Economic Development, Renewable Energy, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).23 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
