
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Please grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.
This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
All Research products
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
A Comparative Study between the Newly Improved and Chinese National Standard Biogas Digesters in a Semi-arid Region of Northwest China

Authors: Yunrang Xian; Y. Wei; Wenguang Ding; X. Mi; H. Niu;
Abstract
Abstract China has intensified the extension of family-sized biogas digesters with the Chinese National Standard in the 1990s. However, such biogas digesters have not performed well. In order to improve the current National Standard biogas digesters, the authors have designed, tested, and demonstrated 200 improved biogas digesters in a semi-arid region of China over the past 7 years and conducted a comparative study between the improved biogas digesters and traditional ones. Conclusions were drawn from the research that the improved biogas digesters are significantly better than the traditional ones in several aspects, such as less water consumption and more gas productivity.
Related Organizations
- Lanzhou University China (People's Republic of)
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average

Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
Citations provided by BIP!
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
popularity
Popularity provided by BIP!
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
0
Average
Average
Average