
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Oxygen beams for therapy: advanced biological treatment planning and experimental verification

Nowadays there is a rising interest towards exploiting new therapeutical beams beyond carbon ions and protons. In particular, [Formula: see text]O ions are being widely discussed due to their increased LET distribution. In this contribution, we report on the first experimental verification of biologically optimized treatment plans, accounting for different biological effects, generated with the TRiP98 planning system with [Formula: see text]O beams, performed at HIT and GSI. This implies the measurements of 3D profiles of absorbed dose as well as several biological measurements. The latter includes the measurements of relative biological effectiveness along the range of linear energy transfer values from ≈20 up to ≈750 keV μ [Formula: see text], oxygen enhancement ratio values and the verification of the kill-painting approach, to overcome hypoxia, with a phantom imitating an unevenly oxygenated target. With the present implementation, our treatment planning system is able to perform a comparative analysis of different ions, according to any given condition of the target. For the particular cases of low target oxygenation, [Formula: see text]O ions demonstrate a higher peak-to-entrance dose ratio for the same cell killing in the target region compared to [Formula: see text]C ions. Based on this phenomenon, we performed a short computational analysis to reveal the potential range of treatment plans, where [Formula: see text]O can benefit over lighter modalities. It emerges that for more hypoxic target regions (partial oxygen pressure of ≈0.15% or lower) and relatively low doses (≈4 Gy or lower) the choice of [Formula: see text]O over [Formula: see text]C or [Formula: see text]He may be justified.
info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/570, biological treatment planning; cell survival; hypoxia; ion beam radiotherapy; oxygen enhancement ratio (OER); relative biological effectiveness (RBE), ion beam radiotherapy, hypoxia, Phantoms, Imaging, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted, cell survival, relative biological effectiveness (RBE), Oxygen, biological treatment planning; cell survival; hypoxia; ion beam radiotherapy; oxygen enhancement ratio (OER); relative biological effectiveness (RBE); Linear Energy Transfer; Oxygen; Phantoms, Imaging; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted; Relative Biological Effectiveness, biological treatment planning, Linear Energy Transfer, oxygen enhancement ratio (OER), Relative Biological Effectiveness
info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/570, biological treatment planning; cell survival; hypoxia; ion beam radiotherapy; oxygen enhancement ratio (OER); relative biological effectiveness (RBE), ion beam radiotherapy, hypoxia, Phantoms, Imaging, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted, cell survival, relative biological effectiveness (RBE), Oxygen, biological treatment planning; cell survival; hypoxia; ion beam radiotherapy; oxygen enhancement ratio (OER); relative biological effectiveness (RBE); Linear Energy Transfer; Oxygen; Phantoms, Imaging; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted; Relative Biological Effectiveness, biological treatment planning, Linear Energy Transfer, oxygen enhancement ratio (OER), Relative Biological Effectiveness
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).68 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
