
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
An improved model for the accurate calculation of parallel heat fluxes at the JET bulk tungsten outer divertor

handle: 11588/876576 , 10281/413632 , 11583/2964853 , 11577/3357330 , 2108/314868 , 11584/353863 , 11563/134607
handle: 11588/876576 , 10281/413632 , 11583/2964853 , 11577/3357330 , 2108/314868 , 11584/353863 , 11563/134607
Parallel heat flux calculations at the JET divertor have been based on the assumption that all incoming heat is due to the projection of the heat flux parallel to the magnetic line, q , plus a constant background. This simplification led to inconsistencies during the analysis of a series of dedicated tungsten melting experiments performed in 2013, for which infrared (IR) thermography surface measurements could not be recreated through simulations unless the parallel heat flux was reduced by 80% for L-mode and 60% for H-mode. We give an explanation for these differences using a new IR inverse analysis code, a set of geometrical corrections, and most importantly an additional term for the divertor heat flux accounting for non-parallel effects such as cross-field transport, recycled neutrals or charge exchange. This component has been evaluated comparing four different geometries with impinging angles varying from 2 to 90°. Its magnitude corresponds to 1.2%–1.9% of q , but because it is not affected by the magnetic projection, it accounts for up to 20%–30% of the tile surface heat flux. The geometrical corrections imply a further reduction of 24% of the measured heat flux. In addition, the application of the new inverse code increases the accuracy of the tile heat flux calculation, eliminating any previous discrepancy. The parallel heat flux computed with this new model is actually much lower than previously deduced by inverse analysis of IR temperatures—40% for L-mode and 50% for H-mode—while being independent of the geometry on which it is measured. This main result confirms the validity of the optical projection as long as a non-constant and non-parallel component is considered. For a given total heating power, the model predicts over 10% reduction of the maximum tile surface heat flux compared to strict optical modelling, as well as a 30% reduced sensitivity to manufacturing and assembling tolerances. These conclusions, along with the improvement in the predictability of the divertor thermal behaviour, are critical for JET future DT operations, and are also directly applicable to the design of the ITER divertor monoblocks. EURATOM 633053
- Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory United States
- University Federico II of Naples Italy
- University of Padua Italy
- University of Rome Tor Vergata Italy
- Aix Marseille Université (La Timone) France
Other Physics Topics, Energy Engineering, divertor; ITER-like wall; JET; optical projection; parallel heat flux, Parallel heat flux, 530, iter-like wall, Optical projection, power, divertor; ITER-like wall; JET; optical projection; parallel heat flux;, Fusion, plasma och rymdfysik, Divertor, [PHYS.PHYS.PHYS-PLASM-PH]Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]/Plasma Physics [physics.plasm-ph], jet, parallel heat flux, divertor, SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy, Innovation, Nuclear and High Energy Physic, [PHYS.MECA.THER] Physics [physics]/Mechanics [physics]/Thermics [physics.class-ph], ITER-like wall, 621, asdex-upgrade, optical projection, Condensed Matter Physics, Fusion, Plasma and Space Physics, Settore ING-IND/20 - MISURE E STRUMENTAZIONE NUCLEARI, Computational Mathematics, JET; divertor; parallel heat flux; optical projection; ITER-like wall; ASDEX-UPGRADE; POWER, JET, [PHYS.PHYS.PHYS-PLASM-PH] Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]/Plasma Physics [physics.plasm-ph], [PHYS.MECA.THER]Physics [physics]/Mechanics [physics]/Thermics [physics.class-ph], and Infrastructure, SDG 9 - Industry, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/620
Other Physics Topics, Energy Engineering, divertor; ITER-like wall; JET; optical projection; parallel heat flux, Parallel heat flux, 530, iter-like wall, Optical projection, power, divertor; ITER-like wall; JET; optical projection; parallel heat flux;, Fusion, plasma och rymdfysik, Divertor, [PHYS.PHYS.PHYS-PLASM-PH]Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]/Plasma Physics [physics.plasm-ph], jet, parallel heat flux, divertor, SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy, Innovation, Nuclear and High Energy Physic, [PHYS.MECA.THER] Physics [physics]/Mechanics [physics]/Thermics [physics.class-ph], ITER-like wall, 621, asdex-upgrade, optical projection, Condensed Matter Physics, Fusion, Plasma and Space Physics, Settore ING-IND/20 - MISURE E STRUMENTAZIONE NUCLEARI, Computational Mathematics, JET; divertor; parallel heat flux; optical projection; ITER-like wall; ASDEX-UPGRADE; POWER, JET, [PHYS.PHYS.PHYS-PLASM-PH] Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]/Plasma Physics [physics.plasm-ph], [PHYS.MECA.THER]Physics [physics]/Mechanics [physics]/Thermics [physics.class-ph], and Infrastructure, SDG 9 - Industry, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/620
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).11 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
