
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Contribution of environmental forcings to US runoff changes for the period 1950–2010

Abstract Runoff in the United States is changing, and this study finds that the measured change is dependent on the geographic region and varies seasonally. Specifically, observed annual total runoff had an insignificant increasing trend in the US between 1950 and 2010, but this insignificance was due to regional heterogeneity with both significant and insignificant increases in the eastern, northern, and southern US, and a greater significant decrease in the western US. Trends for seasonal mean runoff also differed across regions. By region, the season with the largest observed trend was autumn for the east (positive), spring for the north (positive), winter for the south (positive), winter for the west (negative), and autumn for the US as a whole (positive). Based on the detection and attribution analysis using gridded WaterWatch runoff observations along with semi-factorial land surface model simulations from the Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP), we found that while the roles of CO2 concentration, nitrogen deposition, and land use and land cover were inconsistent regionally and seasonally, the effect of climatic variations was detected for all regions and seasons, and the change in runoff could be attributed to climate change in summer and autumn in the south and in autumn in the west. We also found that the climate-only and historical transient simulations consistently underestimated the runoff trends, possibly due to precipitation bias in the MsTMIP driver or within the models themselves.
- University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign United States
- Goddard Space Flight Center United States
- University of Maine United States
- California Institute of Technology United States
- Auburn University United States
Atmospheric Science, Biogeochemical Cycling of Nutrients in Aquatic Ecosystems, Physical geography, Period (music), Science, QC1-999, Precipitation, Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering, Environmental science, land-use change, Meteorology, MsTMIP, Environmental Chemistry, Climate change, GE1-350, Biology, detection and attribution, TD1-1066, Water Science and Technology, Climatology, Geography, Ecology, Physics, Q, Geology, FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences, Acoustics, Surface runoff, Environmental sciences, Earth and Planetary Sciences, Hydrological Modeling and Water Resource Management, FOS: Biological sciences, Environmental Science, Physical Sciences, Impacts of Climate Change on Glaciers and Water Availability, US runoff
Atmospheric Science, Biogeochemical Cycling of Nutrients in Aquatic Ecosystems, Physical geography, Period (music), Science, QC1-999, Precipitation, Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering, Environmental science, land-use change, Meteorology, MsTMIP, Environmental Chemistry, Climate change, GE1-350, Biology, detection and attribution, TD1-1066, Water Science and Technology, Climatology, Geography, Ecology, Physics, Q, Geology, FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences, Acoustics, Surface runoff, Environmental sciences, Earth and Planetary Sciences, Hydrological Modeling and Water Resource Management, FOS: Biological sciences, Environmental Science, Physical Sciences, Impacts of Climate Change on Glaciers and Water Availability, US runoff
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).9 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
