
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Peer-to-Peer Local Energy Market: Opportunities, Barriers, Security, and Implementation Options

handle: 10356/178551
The concept of the peer-to-peer local energy market (P2P LEM) is no longer novel to the energy community. Yet, its large-scale implementation within the current electricity network remains a complex challenge. One key reason is the lack of understanding of the supplier licensing models in different countries. For instance, in the UK, up to year 2023, a consumer is only allowed to have a single supplier at a time under its single licence supplier model. This directly contradicts the existing P2P trading models that allow a consumer to purchase electricity from multiple sellers within the local market. Given this context, this article conducts a review of recent literature and government policies in different countries on the P2P LEM and identifies the barriers behind the lack of large-scale P2P trading implementation in today’s electricity markets. We explain how these barriers can be overcome by engaging prosumers in traditional and private distribution networks through either licensed or license-exempt suppliers. Particularly, we discuss six P2P LEM frameworks that can be utilised to address the supplier licensing issue. Finally, this review presents a summary of risks, and recommendations to aid the regulatory framework to implement P2P LEM.
- Manchester Metropolitan University United Kingdom
- University of Queensland Australia
- Manchester Metropolitan University United Kingdom
- Hohai University China (People's Republic of)
- NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY Singapore
330, barriers, security, large scale implementation, 09 Engineering, TK1-9971, Engineering, distribution networks, Distribution networks, 10 Technology, Peer-to-peer local energy market, 08 Information and Computing Sciences, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, policy
330, barriers, security, large scale implementation, 09 Engineering, TK1-9971, Engineering, distribution networks, Distribution networks, 10 Technology, Peer-to-peer local energy market, 08 Information and Computing Sciences, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, policy
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).1 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
