
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
A benchmark of dynamic reliability methods for probabilistic safety assessment
handle: 11311/1053262
Various dynamic reliability methods have been developed during the last several decades, such as Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, Dynamic Event Tree (DET) and Monte Carlo Dynamic Event Tree (MCDET) methods, to name a few. This paper benchmarks these particular methods by applying them to a classic level control dynamic system and to a realistic Emergency and Standby Power System (ESPS). The analysis is done with respect to different component aging dynamics and transition rate state dependences. Efficiency and computational cost are evaluated. The results show that: (1) the dynamic methods indeed are capable of capturing the effects of the dynamics in the process; (2) DET can model the possible accidental sequences, but at a large computational cost; (3) accurate modelling of sequences with low probabilities of occurrence can be achieved by the MCDET method.
- Shanghai University of Electric Power China (People's Republic of)
- Shanghai University of Electric Power China (People's Republic of)
- Laboratoire Génie Industriel France
- Polytechnic University of Milan Italy
- Laboratoire Génie Industriel France
[INFO]Computer Science [cs], [INFO] Computer Science [cs]
[INFO]Computer Science [cs], [INFO] Computer Science [cs]
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).7 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
