Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Thermal Laser Separation of PERC and SHJ Solar Cells

Authors: Puzant Baliozian; Anna Munzer; Elmar Lohmuller; Aathira Nair; Tobias Fellmeth; Nico Wohrle; Hannes Hoffler; +2 Authors

Thermal Laser Separation of PERC and SHJ Solar Cells

Abstract

This article investigates thermal laser separation (TLS) on p -type Czochralski-grown silicon (Cz-Si) passivated emitter and rear cells (PERC) and n -type Cz-Si heterojunction (SHJ) solar cells. The TLS comprises of two laser-based processes: the crack initiation by a scribe laser and the crack propagation by a cleave process leading to separated cells with smooth edge surfaces. The sole impact of the cleave process on the cells’ passivation layers is examined by performing it without the initial scribe, not separating the samples. By means of photoluminescence imaging, different cleave laser powers P C on passivated PERC and SHJ cell precursors are investigated, and the optimum P C values are then chosen for the processing of metallized and fired host cells with half cell and shingle cell layouts. Both, the cleave process as well as the complete TLS process are then separately performed in order to investigate the effect of each individual process by Suns V OC measurements taken before and after processing. For monofacial PERC cells, a drop in pseudofill factor Δ pFF = – 0.3%abs is recorded after TLS of the host cell into five shingle cells with 31.35 mm cell width. The effect on bifacial SHJ cells is stronger with Δ pFF = – 2.1%abs. Thereby, the cleave process itself does not induce significant losses in the cell performance for both cell types. The main losses are attributed to the recombination at the newly created unpassivated edges after complete TLS.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    15
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
15
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%