Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Impact of Local Back-Surface-Field Thickness Variation on Performance of PERC Solar Cells

Authors: Byungsul Min; Matthias Muller; Bettina Wolpensinger; Gerd Fischer; Phedon Palinginis; Dirk Holger Neuhaus; Rolf Brendel;

Impact of Local Back-Surface-Field Thickness Variation on Performance of PERC Solar Cells

Abstract

This article investigates the impact of the back-surface-field (BSF) thickness variation within a local aluminum contact on the performance of passivated emitter and rear contact solar cells. A significant difference of BSF thickness between contact endings and the center of dash-shaped contacts is verified experimentally by a comprehensive statistical analysis using scanning electron microscopy. The impact of local BSF thickness differences on the cell performance is studied with 3-D technology computer-aided design (TCAD) device simulations. Several device parameters such as BSF thicknesses, the doping concentration in the BSF profile at rear contacts, or the metallized area fraction at the cell rear side are varied. Our simulation study shows that the open-circuit voltage is mainly affected by locally reduced BSF thicknesses, resulting in an efficiency loss up to 0.14%abs or 0.84%abs, respectively, if an area fraction of 1% or 20% within a local contact has reduced BSF thicknesses. This effect can be minimized either by reducing the metallized area fraction at the cell rear side or by increasing the doping concentration in the BSF profile at aluminum rear contacts. In addition, we demonstrate that the 3-D simulations can be approximated with 2-D simulations by applying a single doping profile with an average BSF thickness, calculated with the harmonic mean.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Energy Research