<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Fairness of Power System Load-Shedding Plans

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Conference object , Article 01 Oct 2018 United Kingdom Publisher:IEEEJournal:2018 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)

Authors: Heylen, E; Ovaere, M; Van Hertem, D; Deconinck, G;

doi: 10.1109/smc.2018.00245

Fairness of Power System Load-Shedding Plans

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Transmission system operators apply selective load-shedding plans to prevent system wide interruptions and black-outs due to generation and transmission adequacy issues. If the load-shedding plan is activated, the electricity supply is intentionally switched off in indicated areas for a fixed period of time. The burden of load-shedding plans thus falls on a subset of consumers, while the benefits accrue to all consumers. This results in public opposition as illustrated with the publication of the load-shedding plan in Belgium in the winter of 2014 - 2015. To improve the social acceptability of load-shedding plans, we analyzed the unfairness of load-shedding plans based on Gini-based inequality indices and studied a top-down socialized compensation scheme and bottom-up priority service contracts to indirectly reduce the unfairness. The analysis is executed for a simplified version of the Belgian load-shedding plan for the winter of 2014 - 2015.

Country

United Kingdom

Related Organizations

Keywords

Technology, Science & Technology, Computer Science, Information Systems, inequality, fairness, Power system reliability, load-shedding plan, inequity, Computer Science, Computer Science, Cybernetics

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	3
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average