Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao IEEE Transactions on...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: IEEE Copyright
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

PI-Consensus Based Distributed Control of AC Microgrids

Authors: Mengxuan Shi; Xia Chen; Jianyu Zhou; Yin Chen; Jinyu Wen; Haibo He;

PI-Consensus Based Distributed Control of AC Microgrids

Abstract

The conventional voltage observer based distributed control can make a tradeoff between voltage restoration and reactive power sharing. However, it suffers from estimation error when there exist input disturbances, such as initial values and communication delays. To address this problem, this paper proposes a novel distributed secondary control based on PI consensus algorithm. A voltage controller and a frequency controller are designed separately to realize the restoration of voltage/frequency and also accurate reactive/active power allocation. Moreover, a detailed small-signal model with PI consensus algorithm is established to show the impact of the proposed control strategy on the system stability. Compared with the conventional distributed control, the proposed control scheme is simpler with higher control accuracy under input disturbances. Simulations are conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed control strategy in an isolated ac microgrid.

Country
United States
Keywords

Microgrid, 621, time delay, PI consensus algorithm, 620, 629, distributed generator (DG)

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    48
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
48
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 1%