
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Drought tolerance as predicted by leaf water potential at turgor loss point varies strongly across species within an Amazonian forest

Summary Amazonian droughts are predicted to become increasingly frequent and intense, and the vulnerability of Amazonian trees has become increasingly documented. However, little is known about the physiological mechanisms and the diversity of drought tolerance of tropical trees due to the lack of quantitative measurements. Leaf water potential at wilting or turgor loss point (πtlp) is a determinant of the tolerance of leaves to drought stress and contributes to plant‐level physiological drought tolerance. Recently, it has been demonstrated that leaf osmotic water potential at full hydration (πo) is tightly correlated with πtlp. Estimating πtlp from osmometer measurements of πo is much faster than the standard pressure–volume curve approach of πtlp determination. We used this technique to estimate πtlp for 165 trees of 71 species, at three sites within forests in French Guiana. Our data set represents a significant increase in available data for this trait for tropical tree species. Tropical trees showed a wider range of drought tolerance than previously found in the literature, πtlp ranging from −1·4 to −3·2 MPa. This range likely corresponds in part to adaptation and acclimation to occasionally extreme droughts during the dry season. Leaf‐level drought tolerance varied across species, in agreement with the available published observations of species variation in drought‐induced mortality. On average, species with a more negative πtlp (i.e. with greater leaf‐level drought tolerance) occurred less frequently across the region than drought‐sensitive species. Across individuals, πtlp correlated positively but weakly with leaf toughness (R2 = 0·22, P = 0·04) and leaf thickness (R2 = 0·03, P = 0·03). No correlation was detected with other functional traits (leaf mass per area, leaf area, nitrogen or carbon concentrations, carbon isotope ratio, sapwood density or bark thickness). The variability in πtlp among species indicates a potential for highly diverse species responses to drought within given forest communities. Given the weak correlations between πtlp and traditionally measured plant functional traits, vegetation models seeking to predict forest response to drought should integrate improved quantification of comparative drought tolerance among tree species.
- Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement France
- National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment France
- Laboratoire Parole et Langage France
- Département Sciences sociales, agriculture et alimentation, espace et environnement France
- Paul Sabatier University France
580, Tropical trees, 570, changement climatique, arbre tropical, Plant-water relations, relation plante eau, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], Climate change;French Guiana;Functional traits;Plant-water relations;Tropical trees, French Guiana, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], Climate change, guyane française, Functional traits
580, Tropical trees, 570, changement climatique, arbre tropical, Plant-water relations, relation plante eau, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], Climate change;French Guiana;Functional traits;Plant-water relations;Tropical trees, French Guiana, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], Climate change, guyane française, Functional traits
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).169 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
