
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
The extent and predictability of the biodiversity–carbon correlation
AbstractProtecting biomass carbon stocks to mitigate climate change has direct implications for biodiversity conservation. Yet, evidence that a positive association exists between carbon density and species richness is contrasting. Here, we test how this association varies (1) across spatial extents and (2) as a function of how strongly carbon and species richness depend on environmental variables. We found the correlation weakens when moving from larger extents, e.g. realms, to narrower extents, e.g. ecoregions. For ecoregions, a positive correlation emerges when both species richness and carbon density vary as functions of the same environmental variables (climate, soil, elevation). In 20% of tropical ecoregions, there are opportunities to pursue carbon conservation with direct biodiversity co‐benefits, while other ecoregions require careful planning for both species and carbon to avoid potentially perverse outcomes. The broad assumption of a linear relationship between carbon and biodiversity can lead to undesired outcomes.
- University of Queensland Australia
- University of Melbourne Australia
- The Nature Conservancy United States
- University of Queensland Australia
- University of Queensland Australia
570, Conservation of Natural Resources, Carbon density, Evolution, Carbon density; conservation goals; macroecology; REDD+; scale; SDG; species richness, 577, SDG, Biodiversity, 333, Carbon, 1105 Ecology, scale, Soil, Behavior and Systematics, conservation goals, macroecology, Biomass, species richness, REDD+
570, Conservation of Natural Resources, Carbon density, Evolution, Carbon density; conservation goals; macroecology; REDD+; scale; SDG; species richness, 577, SDG, Biodiversity, 333, Carbon, 1105 Ecology, scale, Soil, Behavior and Systematics, conservation goals, macroecology, Biomass, species richness, REDD+
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).55 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
