
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Trade‐off between soil carbon sequestration and net ecosystem economic benefits for paddy fields under long‐term application of biochar

AbstractThe application of biochar and nitrogen fertilizer can increase rice yield, soil organic carbon (SOC) storage and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, few studies have systematically evaluated the carbon footprint (CF) and net ecosystem economic benefits (NEEB) of paddy ecosystems under long‐term application of biochar and nitrogen fertilizer. Here, the life cycle assessment method was used to quantify the CF and NEEB of paddy fields under different biochar and nitrogen fertilizer application rates in 7 years. Three biochar rates of 0 (B0), 4.5 (B1) and 13.5 t ha−1 year−1 (B2) and two nitrogen fertilizer rates of 0 (N0) and 300 kg ha−1 year−1 (N) were set. The results showed that B2 significantly increased methane (CH4) emission by 38%, decreased nitrous oxide (N2O) emission by 29%, and significantly increased global warming potential by 27% compared with B0. Besides that, biochar application significantly increased ΔCSOC by 87%–173% and reduced CF by 1.6–1.8 Mg CO2 eq ha−1. Among them, CH4 and N2O emissions contributed 46%–95% of total GHG emissions, and the production and transportation of nitrogen fertilizer and biochar contributed 17%–52% of total GHG emissions. Nitrogen fertilizer application can significantly increase rice yield by 85% compared to the N0, which could bring the largest NEEB. Biochar application had a negative influence on the NEEB regardless of N application. This might be attributable to the fact that the economic gains from increased rice production and SOC caused by biochar cannot outweigh the high cost of biochar. These results suggest that the biochar application can significantly improve the SOC sequestration and reduce the CF, but also had negative effect on NEEB in paddy filed.
- Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture China (People's Republic of)
- Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences China (People's Republic of)
Sustainable Diets and Environmental Impact, Carbon sequestration, carbon footprint, Environmental Engineering, Nitrogen, life cycle assessment method, TJ807-830, Soil Science, Organic chemistry, Energy industries. Energy policy. Fuel trade, Greenhouse gas, Renewable energy sources, Environmental science, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, soil carbon sequestration, Fertilizer, Life Cycle Assessment and Environmental Impact Analysis, Soil water, biochar, Biology, Ecosystem, Biochar Application, net ecosystem economic benefits, Soil science, Soil Fertility, Nitrous oxide, Ecology, FOS: Environmental engineering, Life Sciences, Soil carbon, Agronomy, Biochar, Chemistry, global warming potential, FOS: Biological sciences, Environmental Science, Physical Sciences, HD9502-9502.5, Soil Carbon Dynamics and Nutrient Cycling in Ecosystems, Ecosystem Functioning, Pyrolysis
Sustainable Diets and Environmental Impact, Carbon sequestration, carbon footprint, Environmental Engineering, Nitrogen, life cycle assessment method, TJ807-830, Soil Science, Organic chemistry, Energy industries. Energy policy. Fuel trade, Greenhouse gas, Renewable energy sources, Environmental science, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, soil carbon sequestration, Fertilizer, Life Cycle Assessment and Environmental Impact Analysis, Soil water, biochar, Biology, Ecosystem, Biochar Application, net ecosystem economic benefits, Soil science, Soil Fertility, Nitrous oxide, Ecology, FOS: Environmental engineering, Life Sciences, Soil carbon, Agronomy, Biochar, Chemistry, global warming potential, FOS: Biological sciences, Environmental Science, Physical Sciences, HD9502-9502.5, Soil Carbon Dynamics and Nutrient Cycling in Ecosystems, Ecosystem Functioning, Pyrolysis
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).8 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
