

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Reassessing global change research priorities in mediterranean terrestrial ecosystems: how far have we come and where do we go from here?

doi: 10.1111/geb.12224
handle: 10261/151456
AbstractAimMediterranean terrestrial ecosystems serve as reference laboratories for the investigation of global change because of their transitional climate, the high spatiotemporal variability of their environmental conditions, a rich and unique biodiversity and a wide range of socio‐economic conditions. As scientific development and environmental pressures increase, it is increasingly necessary to evaluate recent progress and to challenge research priorities in the face of global change.LocationMediterranean terrestrial ecosystems.MethodsThis article revisits the research priorities proposed in a 1998 assessment.ResultsA new set of research priorities is proposed: (1) to establish the role of the landscape mosaic on fire‐spread; (2) to further research the combined effect of different drivers on pest expansion; (3) to address the interaction between drivers of global change and recent forest management practices; (4) to obtain more realistic information on the impacts of global change and ecosystem services; (5) to assess forest mortality events associated with climatic extremes; (6) to focus global change research on identifying and managing vulnerable areas; (7) to use the functional traits concept to study resilience after disturbance; (8) to study the relationship between genotypic and phenotypic diversity as a source of forest resilience; (9) to understand the balance betweenCstorage and water resources; (10) to analyse the interplay between landscape‐scale processes and biodiversity conservation; (11) to refine models by including interactions between drivers and socio‐economic contexts; (12) to understand forest–atmosphere feedbacks; (13) to represent key mechanisms linking plant hydraulics with landscape hydrology.Main conclusions(1) The interactive nature of different global change drivers remains poorly understood. (2) There is a critical need for the rapid development of regional‐ and global‐scale models that are more tightly connected with large‐scale experiments, data networks and management practice. (3) More attention should be directed to drought‐related forest decline and the current relevance of historical land use.
water reserves, Life on Land, Factors interaction, forest management, Land-use change, Assessment, land-use change, Land‐use change, research gaps, Research gaps, atmosphere-biosphere interaction, Climate change, biodiversity, Ecology, Forest management, Biodiversity, Atmosphere-biosphere interaction, Environmental Management, Fire regime, climate change, Ecological Applications, Atmosphere–biosphere interaction, factors interaction, Water reserves, fire regime, Environmental Sciences
water reserves, Life on Land, Factors interaction, forest management, Land-use change, Assessment, land-use change, Land‐use change, research gaps, Research gaps, atmosphere-biosphere interaction, Climate change, biodiversity, Ecology, Forest management, Biodiversity, Atmosphere-biosphere interaction, Environmental Management, Fire regime, climate change, Ecological Applications, Atmosphere–biosphere interaction, factors interaction, Water reserves, fire regime, Environmental Sciences
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).118 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% visibility views 51 download downloads 38 - 51views38downloads
Data source Views Downloads DIGITAL.CSIC 51 38


