Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Geostandards and Geo...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Characterisation of Geological Samples with Dual‐Energy XCT: A Comparison of Three Different Scanners

A Comparison of Three Different Scanners
Authors: Margherita Martini; Pierre Francus; Laurenz Schröer; Florian Buyse; Pierre Kibleur; Veerle Cnudde; Leonardo Di Schiavi Trotta; +1 Authors

Characterisation of Geological Samples with Dual‐Energy XCT: A Comparison of Three Different Scanners

Abstract

The stoichiometric calibration method for dual‐energy computed tomography (DECT) can be used in geosciences to characterise materials based on their effective atomic number (Zeff) and their electron density (ρe) without previous knowledge of the incident X‐ray beam. A stoichiometrically calibrated DECT method was applied here to measure these two properties on three different sedimentary rocks using three different X‐ray CT instruments to determine which one is best to reveal the chemical composition or the mineralogical variations at the meso‐scale. The three tested instruments: (1) a medical CT, (2) a custom‐built micro‐CT, and (3) a commercial micro‐CT. Several acquisition settings were tested to identify the most suitable parameters for the characterisation the samples. Some parameters such as incident energies, resolution and calibration materials proved to have a significant impact on the accuracy of the characterisation. The determination of a general measurement protocol for geological samples was found to be difficult because of several complicating factors, including the nature of the sample, objectives of the study, and instrumental limitations that influence DECT characterisation. Nonetheless, comparison of the results obtained by the three scanners brings out the key parameters to be considered to perform a useful rock sample characterisation with DECT.

Countries
Netherlands, Belgium
Related Organizations
Keywords

characterisation, NUMBERS, COAL, geology, scanners, X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY, COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY, computed tomography, dual-energy, CT

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Related to Research communities
Energy Research