
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Biodiversity maintenance mechanisms differ between native and novel exotic‐dominated communities

pmid: 19379137
Biodiversity maintenance mechanisms differ between native and novel exotic‐dominated communities
AbstractIn many systems, native communities are being replaced by novel exotic‐dominated ones. We experimentally compared species diversity decline between nine‐species grassland communities under field conditions to test whether diversity maintenance mechanisms differed between communities containing all exotic or all native species using a pool of 40 species. Aboveground biomass was greater in exotic than native plots, and this difference was larger in mixtures than in monocultures. Species diversity declined more in exotic than native communities and declines were explained by different mechanisms. In exotic communities, overyielding species had high biomass in monoculture and diversity declined linearly as this selection effect increased. In native communities, however, overyielding species had low biomass in monoculture and there was no relationship between the selection effect and diversity decline. This suggests that, for this system, yielding behaviour is fundamentally different between presumably co‐evolved natives and coevolutionarily naive exotic species, and that native‐exotic status is important to consider.
- Iowa State University United States
- University of Nebraska System United States
- Agricultural Research Service United States
- University of Nebraska System United States
- Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center United States
novel ecosystems, biodiversity–ecosystem functioning, Conservation of Natural Resources, species diversity, grasslands, net biodiversity effect, Biodiversity, Poaceae, Models, Biological, Texas, invasive species, tallgrass prairie, biodiversity loss, Species Specificity, Biomass, species richness, Agricultural Science, restoration ecology, Ecosystem
novel ecosystems, biodiversity–ecosystem functioning, Conservation of Natural Resources, species diversity, grasslands, net biodiversity effect, Biodiversity, Poaceae, Models, Biological, Texas, invasive species, tallgrass prairie, biodiversity loss, Species Specificity, Biomass, species richness, Agricultural Science, restoration ecology, Ecosystem
3 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2017IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2014IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2017IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).85 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
