
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Ökonomische Bewertung des Erneuerbare Energien Gesetzes zur Förderung von Biogas

AbstractThe Renewable-Energy-Source-Act (EEG) promotes German biogas production in order to substitute fossil fuels, protect the environment and prevent climate change. In this paper we quantitatively analyse the EEG-reform in 2008. Results imply that the reform contributes to an expansion of biogas electricity generation and thus to substitution of fossil fuels. However, subsidies, land and transport emissions per unit of electricity produced increase. An alternative analysis shows that an EEG with tariffs independent from plant-types would provide the highest subsidy-efficiency, lower land requirements and higher transport emissions compared to EEG before its reformation.
- University of Bonn Germany
- Kiel Institute for the World Economy Germany
- University of Bonn Germany
- Leibniz Association Germany
- University of Bonn Germany
Biogas, land use, renewable energy policy, coupled models, EEG, Q42, coupled models, Q48, Biogas, Wirkungsanalyse, Förderung regenerativer Energien, EEG, Deutschland, Bioenergie, Q15, land use, Landwirtschaftliche Bodennutzung, renewable energy policy, C61, C02, jel: jel:C61, jel: jel:C02, jel: jel:Q42, jel: jel:Q48, jel: jel:Q15, ddc: ddc:330
Biogas, land use, renewable energy policy, coupled models, EEG, Q42, coupled models, Q48, Biogas, Wirkungsanalyse, Förderung regenerativer Energien, EEG, Deutschland, Bioenergie, Q15, land use, Landwirtschaftliche Bodennutzung, renewable energy policy, C61, C02, jel: jel:C61, jel: jel:C02, jel: jel:Q42, jel: jel:Q48, jel: jel:Q15, ddc: ddc:330
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).5 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
