
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Preparation and Performance Evaluation of Microporous Transport Layers for Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Water Electrolyzer Anodes

In this work, ≈25 μm thin titanium microporous layers (MPLs) with ≈2 μm small pores and low surface roughness were coated and sintered on top of ≈260 μm thick commercial titanium-powder-sinter sheets with ≈16 μm pores, maintaining a porosity of ≈40% in both layers. Serving as porous transport layers (PTLs) on the anode side in proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers (PEMWEs), these pore-graded, two-layer sheets (“PTL/MPL”) are compared to single-layer PTLs in single-cell PEMWEs. The PTL/MPL samples prepared here give a 3–6 mΩ cm2 lower high-frequency resistance (HFR) compared to the as-received single-layer PTL, which is attributed to a partial reduction of the TiO2 surface passivation layer during the MPL sintering process. For ≈1 μm thin anodes with an iridium loading of ≈0.2 mgIr cm−2, the use of an MPL leads to a ≈24 mV improvement in HFR-free cell voltage at 6 A cm−2. As no such benefit is observed for ≈9 μm thick anodes with ≈2.0 mgIr cm−2, mass transport resistances within the PTL/MPL play a minor role. Possible reasons for the higher catalyst utilization in ultra-thin electrodes when using an MPL are discussed. Furthermore, an MPL provides superior mechanical membrane support, which is particularly relevant for thin membranes.
- Technical University of Munich Germany
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).11 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
