Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Method Comparison for Deconvoluting Capacitive and Pseudo-Capacitive Contributions to Electrochemical Capacitor Electrode Behavior

Authors: Marveh Forghani; Scott W. Donne;

Method Comparison for Deconvoluting Capacitive and Pseudo-Capacitive Contributions to Electrochemical Capacitor Electrode Behavior

Abstract

Several electrochemical methods have been developed to determine the contribution of different charge storage mechanisms, such as via the electrical double layer and diffusion-limited processes, to electrochemical capacitor behavior. This includes using cyclic voltammetry (CV) data at different sweep rates to obtain the relationship between voltammetric current and sweep rate, and also the relationship between voltammetric charge and sweep rate. Step potential electrochemical spectroscopy (SPECS) also has been used to effectively differentiate between different charge storage mechanisms. Herein we compare these three methods experimentally and also discuss their advantages and limitations toward differentiating between different charge storage mechanisms. These methods have been applied to electrolytic manganese dioxide (EMD) in 0.5 M K 2 SO 4 between 0.0-0.8 V (vs SCE). It was found that in all cases, the specific capacitance was decreased by increasing the sweep rate. The capacitance-sweep rate dependence was only found to be accurate in a short range of low sweep rates. Overall there was good agreement between the SPECS and current-sweep rate dependence models over the full range of sweep rates. However, the SPECS method provided more precise information about the kinetic behavior of the electrochemical cell through a full range of sweep rates.

Country
Australia
Keywords

electrochemical capacitor behavior, 500, step potential electrochemical spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry, electrolytic manganese dioxide

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    244
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 0.1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 0.1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
244
Top 0.1%
Top 1%
Top 0.1%