
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Pathways to Low Cost Electrochemical Energy Storage: A Comparison of Aqueous and Nonaqueous Flow Batteries

handle: 1721.1/96897
Energy storage is increasingly viewed as a valuable asset for electricity grids composed of high fractions of intermittent sources, like wind turbines, or unreliable transmission and distribution services. However, the likelihood that batteries will meet the stringent cost and durability requirements of grid applications is largely unquantified. In this work, we investigate conceptual and actual aqueous and nonaqueous flow batteries designed to store energy for hours and analyze the relationships among technological performance characteristics, component cost factors, and system price. The benefit of high voltage associated with the nonaqueous approach must be balanced against the burden of high solubility of active materials. Requirements in harmony with economically effective energy storage are derived for both systems to facilitate comparison.
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology United States
- Argonne National Laboratory United States
- United Technologies Research Center Ireland
- United Technologies Research Center Ireland
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).526 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1%
