
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Effect of Non-ionic Surfactant on Fe-N-C Catalyst Layers under HT-PEMFC Conditions

The replacement of Pt-based catalysts by Fe-N-Cs in cathodes of high temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (HT-PEMFC) can significantly reduce material costs.[1] In a previous study, we revealed the feasibility of Fe-N-C-based gas diffusion electrodes (GDEs) for oxygen reduction reaction under HT-PEMFC conditions (conc. H3PO4, 160 °C) and showed the demand for improving the catalyst layer (CL) morphology.[1] We discovered that Fe-N-C catalysts are feasible to maintain the cell performance within a wide range of PTFE contents from 20 to 50 wt% in the CL.[2] Non-ionic surfactants can enhance the wetting of the CL with electrolyte in HT-PEMFC, as Mack et al. revealed by a reduced break-in time of Triton™ complemented Pt/C electrodes.[3] Furthermore, Lee et al. reported improved dispersion of PTFE binder within the catalyst ink due to employed non-ionic surfactant and increased the HT-PEMFC performance of the Pt-based electrode.[4] Our actual study firstly reveals that the non-ionic surfactants Triton™ X-100 and as alternative the less-hazardous Tergitol™ 15-S-9 similarly affect the Fe-N-C ink sedimentation. Therefore, Fe-N-C-based (PMF-0011904, Pajarito Powder) GDEs are fabricated through ultrasonic spray coating with Tergitol™ contents of 0, 1, 20 and 50 wt% in the CL and a constant PTFE amount of 50 wt%. The H2O contact angle decreases with increasing Tergitol™ content in the Fe-N-C CL, revealing an increased wettability. Furthermore, contact angles with conc. H3PO4 are determined at room temperature (RT) and 160 °C. With this approach the wetting behaviors of the CL at HT-PEMFC conditions are imitated. The contact angle of H3PO4 of the 0 wt% Tergitol™ GDE unveils a decrease of 39 % from RT to 160 °C, for the 1 wt% Tergitol™ GDE by only 4 % and by 15 % for the 20 wt% Tergitol™ GDE. No significant change is observed for the 50 wt% Tergitol™ GDE. Tergitol™ provides a sufficiently wetted surface at RT, whereas without Tergitol™ the Fe-N-C CL must be moistened at higher temperatures. Furthermore, the GDE performance is accessed by hot pressing a polybenzimidazole-based membrane onto the CL and subsequent electrochemically characterization in a half-cell setup under HT-PEMFC condition at 160 °C in conc. H3PO4 electrolyte. Figure 1 reveals the effect of Tergitol™ on the GDE performance. A surfactant content above 1 wt% leads to electrode flooding by the electrolyte and thus a performance decay, as the surfactant increased the CL wetting. The results are complemented by detection of the iron content of the GDEs by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and scanning electron microscopy coupled to energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) to compare CL morphologies and compositions along all GDEs. References: [1] J. Müller-Hülstede, T. Zierdt, H. Schmies, D. Schonvogel, Q. Meyer, C. Zhao, P. Wagner, and M. Wark, J. Power Sources, 537 231529 (2022). [2] T. Zierdt, J. Müller‐Hülstede, H. Schmies, D. Schonvogel, P. Wagner, and K. A. Friedrich, ChemElectroChem, 11 e202300583 (2024). [3] F. Mack, T. Morawietz, R. Hiesgen, D. Kramer, V. Gogel, and R. Zeis, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 41 (18), 7475-7483 (2016). [4] W. J. Lee, J. S. Lee, H. Y. Park, H. S. Park, S. Y. Lee, K. H. Song, and H. J. Kim, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 45 (57), 32825-32833 (2020). Figure 1
- German Aerospace Center Germany
Fe-N-C, Catalyst Layer, Fuel Cell, Surfactant, Triton, Tergitol, PTFE, HT-PEMFC
Fe-N-C, Catalyst Layer, Fuel Cell, Surfactant, Triton, Tergitol, PTFE, HT-PEMFC
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).1 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
