
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
An Italian case study of life cycle assessment for a drinking water dispenser

handle: 11367/136157 , 11591/543657
The goal of this article is the comparison of global warming potential, estimated according to IPCC 2013 methodology, between bottled water and a drinking water dispenser made of pine wood. The functional unit is 1 L of water. Two cases are considered: in the first case is considered 1 L of refrigerated water supplied by a water dispenser, in the second case, it is also considered how users come back home with their water. The global warming potential for bottled water packed in polyethylene terephthalate is taken by literature, its average value is equal to 0.16 kg CO2 eq./L. In the first case, the water dispenser has a global warming potential value equal to 6.89 × 10−2 kg CO2 eq./L, the percentage difference between bottled water and water dispenser is about 43% in 100 years. In the end, a comparison of vehicles used by users to come back home is performed. The comparison shows that the use of bikes has a lower impact than cars.
Life cycle assessment; drinking water; bottled water; water station, bottled water; drinking water; Life cycle assessment; water station
Life cycle assessment; drinking water; bottled water; water station, bottled water; drinking water; Life cycle assessment; water station
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
