Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ CGIAR CGSpace (Consu...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Environmental Evidence
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Environmental Evidence
Article
License: CC BY
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Environmental Evidence
Article
Data sources: CORE
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Environmental Evidence
Article . 2012
Data sources: DOAJ
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://dx.doi.org/10.60692/q9...
Other literature type . 2012
Data sources: Datacite
https://dx.doi.org/10.60692/eb...
Other literature type . 2012
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 7 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Comparison of methods for measuring and assessing carbon stocks and carbon stock changes in terrestrial carbon pools. How do the accuracy and precision of current methods compare? A systematic review protocol

مقارنة طرق قياس وتقييم مخزونات الكربون وتغيرات مخزون الكربون في مجمعات الكربون الأرضية. كيف تقارن دقة ودقة الطرق الحالية ؟ بروتوكول مراجعة منهجية
Authors: Gillian Petrokofsky; Hideki Kanamaru; Frédéric Achard; Scott J. Goetz; Hans Joosten; Peter Holmgren; Aleksi Lehtonen; +3 Authors

Comparison of methods for measuring and assessing carbon stocks and carbon stock changes in terrestrial carbon pools. How do the accuracy and precision of current methods compare? A systematic review protocol

Abstract

Le changement climatique et les taux élevés d'émissions mondiales de carbone ont attiré l'attention sur la nécessité de systèmes de surveillance de haute qualité pour évaluer la quantité de carbone présente dans les systèmes terrestres et son évolution dans le temps. Le choix du système à adopter doit être guidé par une bonne science. Il existe un nombre croissant d'informations scientifiques et techniques sur les méthodes de mesure du carbone au sol et par télédétection. L'adéquation et la comparabilité de ces différents systèmes n'ont pas été pleinement évaluées. Un examen systématique comparera les méthodes d'évaluation des stocks de carbone et des changements des stocks de carbone dans les principales catégories d'utilisation des terres, y compris les terres forestières, les terres cultivées, les prairies et les zones humides, dans les réservoirs de carbone terrestres qui peuvent être pris en compte dans le protocole de Kyoto (biomasse aérienne, biomasse souterraine, bois mort, litière et carbone du sol). L'évaluation du carbone dans les produits ligneux récoltés ne sera pas prise en compte dans cette revue. L'élaboration de stratégies d'atténuation efficaces pour réduire les émissions de carbone et de stratégies d'adaptation équitables pour faire face à l'augmentation des températures mondiales reposera sur des informations scientifiques solides et exemptes de biais imposés par les intérêts nationaux et commerciaux. Un examen systématique des méthodes utilisées pour évaluer les stocks de carbone et les variations des stocks de carbone contribuera à l'analyse transparente d'une science complexe et souvent contradictoire.

El cambio climático y las altas tasas de emisiones globales de carbono han centrado la atención en la necesidad de sistemas de monitoreo de alta calidad para evaluar cuánto carbono está presente en los sistemas terrestres y cómo cambian con el tiempo. La elección del sistema a adoptar debe guiarse por la buena ciencia. Existe un creciente cuerpo de información científica y técnica sobre los métodos de medición de carbono basados en tierra y de teledetección. La idoneidad y comparabilidad de estos diferentes sistemas no se han evaluado completamente. Una revisión sistemática comparará los métodos de evaluación de las reservas de carbono y los cambios en las reservas de carbono en las categorías clave de uso de la tierra, incluidas las tierras forestales, las tierras de cultivo, los pastizales y los humedales, en los depósitos de carbono terrestre que se pueden contabilizar en virtud del protocolo de Kyoto (biomasa sobre el suelo, biomasa subterránea, madera muerta, basura y carbono del suelo). La evaluación del carbono en los productos de madera recolectada no se considerará en esta revisión. El desarrollo de estrategias de mitigación efectivas para reducir las emisiones de carbono y estrategias de adaptación equitativas para hacer frente al aumento de las temperaturas globales se basará en información científica sólida que esté libre de sesgos impuestos por intereses nacionales y comerciales. Una revisión sistemática de los métodos utilizados para evaluar las reservas de carbono y los cambios en las reservas de carbono contribuirá al análisis transparente de la ciencia compleja y, a menudo, contradictoria.

Climate change and high rates of global carbon emissions have focussed attention on the need for high-quality monitoring systems to assess how much carbon is present in terrestrial systems and how these change over time. The choice of system to adopt should be guided by good science. There is a growing body of scientific and technical information on ground-based and remote sensing methods of carbon measurement. The adequacy and comparability of these different systems have not been fully evaluated. A systematic review will compare methods of assessing carbon stocks and carbon stock changes in key land use categories, including, forest land, cropland, grassland, and wetlands, in terrestrial carbon pools that can be accounted for under the Kyoto protocol (above- ground biomass, below-ground biomass, dead wood, litter and soil carbon). Assessing carbon in harvested wood products will not be considered in this review. Developing effective mitigation strategies to reduce carbon emissions and equitable adaptation strategies to cope with increasing global temperatures will rely on robust scientific information that is free from biases imposed by national and commercial interests. A systematic review of the methods used for assessing carbon stocks and carbon stock changes will contribute to the transparent analysis of complex and often contradictory science.

ركز تغير المناخ وارتفاع معدلات انبعاثات الكربون العالمية الاهتمام على الحاجة إلى أنظمة مراقبة عالية الجودة لتقييم كمية الكربون الموجودة في الأنظمة الأرضية وكيفية تغيرها بمرور الوقت. يجب أن يسترشد اختيار النظام الذي يجب اعتماده بالعلم الجيد. هناك مجموعة متزايدة من المعلومات العلمية والتقنية حول طرق الاستشعار الأرضي وعن بعد لقياس الكربون. لم يتم تقييم مدى كفاية هذه الأنظمة المختلفة وقابليتها للمقارنة بشكل كامل. ستقارن المراجعة المنهجية طرق تقييم مخزونات الكربون وتغيرات مخزون الكربون في الفئات الرئيسية لاستخدام الأراضي، بما في ذلك أراضي الغابات والأراضي الزراعية والمراعي والأراضي الرطبة، في مجمعات الكربون الأرضية التي يمكن حسابها بموجب بروتوكول كيوتو (الكتلة الحيوية فوق الأرض والكتلة الحيوية تحت الأرض والحطب والقمامة وكربون التربة). لن يتم النظر في تقييم الكربون في منتجات الخشب المقطوع في هذه المراجعة. سيعتمد وضع استراتيجيات تخفيف فعالة للحد من انبعاثات الكربون واستراتيجيات التكيف المنصفة للتعامل مع ارتفاع درجات الحرارة العالمية على معلومات علمية قوية خالية من التحيزات التي تفرضها المصالح الوطنية والتجارية. ستساهم المراجعة المنهجية للطرق المستخدمة لتقييم مخزونات الكربون وتغيرات مخزون الكربون في التحليل الشفاف للعلوم المعقدة والمتناقضة في كثير من الأحيان.

Countries
France, Finland
Keywords

Carbon sequestration, Carbon accounting, Estimation of Forest Biomass and Carbon Stocks, Terrestrial ecosystem, systematic review, metsien hiilitase, Comparability, Soil water, Climate change, GE1-350, Carbon stock, Environmental resource management, maaperä, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Carbon cycle, Soil carbon, climate change, Physical Sciences, Mapping Forests with Lidar Remote Sensing, Carbon Stocks, Environmental Engineering, Atmospheric carbon cycle, biomassa, Greenhouse gas, Environmental science, Impact of Climate Change on Forest Wildfires, FOS: Mathematics, Biology, Ecosystem, systemaattinen arviointi, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Soil science, Carbon offset, carbon, FOS: Environmental engineering, land use, Kyoto Protocol, Environmental sciences, Carbon dioxide, Combinatorics, FOS: Biological sciences, Environmental Science, Mathematics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    79
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
79
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 10%
gold