
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Supporting validity: steps to contextualise applications for technology and assessment, for learning

pmid: 37868340
pmc: PMC10587818
In the paper, the authors offer perspectives on the uses of technology and assessment, that support learning. The perspectives are viewed through validity (from the field of assessment) as a framework and they discuss four aspects of an interconnected technology, learning and assessment space that represent theory informed, authentic practice. The four are: 1) integrated coherence for learning, assessment and technology; 2) responsibilities for equity, diversity, inclusion and wellbeing; 3) sustainability; and 4) balancing resources in global contexts. The authors propose steps and considerations for medical and health professions educators who need to contextualise applications for technology, learning and assessment, for positive impact for learners, faculty, institutions and patient care.
- University of Wollongong Australia
- International Medical University Malaysia
- University of Liverpool United Kingdom
- University of Wollongong Australia
- International Medical University Malaysia
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Knowledge management, FOS: Political science, Social Sciences, FOS: Law, Social psychology, Education, Engineering ethics, Engineering, Health Sciences, Psychology, Equity (law), Political science, Biology, Inclusion (mineral), Ecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health care, Transformation of Medical Education and Professionalism, Opinion Article, Computer science, FOS: Psychology, Errors and Communication in Radiology Imaging, Sustainability, FOS: Biological sciences, Recognition of Prior Learning in Higher Education, Assessment Methods, Medicine, Health technology, Law
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Knowledge management, FOS: Political science, Social Sciences, FOS: Law, Social psychology, Education, Engineering ethics, Engineering, Health Sciences, Psychology, Equity (law), Political science, Biology, Inclusion (mineral), Ecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health care, Transformation of Medical Education and Professionalism, Opinion Article, Computer science, FOS: Psychology, Errors and Communication in Radiology Imaging, Sustainability, FOS: Biological sciences, Recognition of Prior Learning in Higher Education, Assessment Methods, Medicine, Health technology, Law
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
