
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Carbon footprint of reinforced concrete columns with and without supplementary cementitious materials

Abstract Purpose The construction sector consumes a large quantity of natural resources and generates a great deal of carbon dioxide emissions and wastes, affecting its sustainability. Replacing Portland cement with supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) could reduce the environmental impact. This paper examines the carbon footprint of reinforced concrete columns. It focuses on the influence of increasing the steel cross-section and reducing the clinker factor by replacing Portland cement with SCM. Methods Eighteen concrete mixtures were selected and classified according to the specified compressive strength at 28 days of curing using binary and ternary blended cements. Columns were designed consisting of such concretes and employing different reinforcing steel cross-sections. The Life Cycle Assessment was conducted on ISO 14040 standard. The embodied carbon dioxide (ECO2) of the reinforced concrete columns was determined. Results The results show that the higher the compressive strength of concrete, the lower the carbon footprint of the columns. Concretes with a high volume of SCM replacement and low compressive strength at 28 days do not show the lowest carbon footprint since it requires a greater volume of material to withstand the bearing capacity. The carbon footprint of the columns increases as the steel section increases. Furthermore, increasing the compressive strength of concrete is less beneficial for reducing the carbon footprint of the column when the steel cross-section is increased. Conclusions Portland cement is the component material of concrete that contributes the most to the concrete carbon footprint, and steel has the highest ECO2/ton. Replacing Portland cement with SCM reduces ECO2 at one point of the life cycle and may increase the material volume and ECO2 at another. The lowest carbon footprint of compressed reinforced concrete elements is achieved for the higher-strength concretes and the minimum steel cross-section.
Composite material, Portland cement, Life-cycle assessment, Volume (thermodynamics), Economics, Cement, Macroeconomics, Compressive strength, Oceanography, Quantum mechanics, Greenhouse gas, Environmental science, Influence of Recycled Aggregate Concrete on Construction, Engineering, Production (economics), Geopolymer and Alternative Cementitious Materials, Waste management, Civil and Structural Engineering, Sustainable Concrete, High Performance Concrete, Sustainability in Construction, Physics, Geology, Building and Construction, FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences, Reinforcement Corrosion in Concrete Structures, Carbon footprint, Materials science, Physical Sciences, Concrete Properties, Cementitious, Reinforced Concrete
Composite material, Portland cement, Life-cycle assessment, Volume (thermodynamics), Economics, Cement, Macroeconomics, Compressive strength, Oceanography, Quantum mechanics, Greenhouse gas, Environmental science, Influence of Recycled Aggregate Concrete on Construction, Engineering, Production (economics), Geopolymer and Alternative Cementitious Materials, Waste management, Civil and Structural Engineering, Sustainable Concrete, High Performance Concrete, Sustainability in Construction, Physics, Geology, Building and Construction, FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences, Reinforcement Corrosion in Concrete Structures, Carbon footprint, Materials science, Physical Sciences, Concrete Properties, Cementitious, Reinforced Concrete
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).6 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
