
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Comparison of Vehicle Efficiency Technology Attributes and Synergy Estimates
doi: 10.2172/1006244 , 10.2172/1219275
Analyzing the future fuel economy of light-duty vehicles (LDVs) requires detailed knowledge of the vehicle technologies available to improve LDV fuel economy. The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) has been relying on technology data from a 2001 National Academy of Sciences (NAS) study (NAS 2001) on corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards, but the technology parameters were updated in the new proposed rulemaking (EPA and NHTSA 2009) to set CAFE and greenhouse gas standards for the 2011 to 2016 period. The update is based largely on an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) analysis of technology attributes augmented by NHTSA data and contractor staff assessments. These technology cost and performance data were documented in the Draft Joint Technical Support Document (TSD) issued by EPA and NHTSA in September 2009 (EPA/NHTSA 2009). For these tasks, the Energy and Environmental Analysis (EEA) division of ICF International (ICF) examined each technology and technology package in the Draft TSD and assessed their costs and performance potential based on U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) program assessments. ICF also assessed the technologies? other relevant attributes based on data from actual production vehicles and from recently published technical articles in engineering journals. ICF examined technology synergy issues throughmore » an ICF in-house model that uses a discrete parameter approach.« less
- University of North Texas United States
- University of North Texas United States
Consumption, Cost, Energy Efficiency, Performance, Technology Performance, 33 Advanced Propulsion Systems, Energy Analysis, Light-Duty Vehicles, Department Of Energy, Icf International, Ldv, Technology Assessment, Technology Synergy, Doe, Technology Cost, 32 Energy Conservation, Vehicle Synergies, Nrel, Epa, Fuel Economy, Vehicles Nrel, Fuel Consumption, Vehicle Efficiency, And Utilization, Energy Model, Forecasting
Consumption, Cost, Energy Efficiency, Performance, Technology Performance, 33 Advanced Propulsion Systems, Energy Analysis, Light-Duty Vehicles, Department Of Energy, Icf International, Ldv, Technology Assessment, Technology Synergy, Doe, Technology Cost, 32 Energy Conservation, Vehicle Synergies, Nrel, Epa, Fuel Economy, Vehicles Nrel, Fuel Consumption, Vehicle Efficiency, And Utilization, Energy Model, Forecasting
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).11 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
