Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ http://www.witpress....arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
http://www.witpress.com/Secure...
Conference object
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.2495/esus21...
Conference object . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR ENERGY PROJECT EVALUATION IN RUSSIAN BUSINESS PRACTICE: IMPROVING THE OBJECTIVITY OF INVESTING DECISIONS

Authors: Chebotareva, G.; Desyatkova, A.;

METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR ENERGY PROJECT EVALUATION IN RUSSIAN BUSINESS PRACTICE: IMPROVING THE OBJECTIVITY OF INVESTING DECISIONS

Abstract

Investment projects in the energy sector are complex and super capital-intensive plans involve not only individual companies, but also cities and even whole regions. This makes it relevant to investigate the issue of objectivity in the evaluation of investment projects and investment decisions. Despite the basic concepts and evaluation procedures being spelled out in Russian legislation, certain methodological aspects are left to the discretion of energy companies. There is a serious problem of the lack of sufficient hands-on experience in effectiveness management in Russian energy companies under out-of-theordinary and fast-changing conditions. This further dents the objectivity of investment project evaluation. The article presents a summary of methods of evaluating the effectiveness of energy projects that are used in Russia and abroad. An expert analysis of the applicability of the methods was conducted on the basis of 15 criteria, including technical, social and economic, industry-specific aspects, sensitivity, impacts of risk etc. Based on the results of the analysis, the authors suggest their own method of evaluating the effectiveness of energy projects. The method supplements traditional investment calculations with ten new phases, including scenario forecasting of revenue, estimation of operating costs, analysis of risks on the basis of project sensitivity, measurement of technical and economic performance etc. The method was given a trial by Russia's largest grid company Rosseti. The calculations confirmed enhanced objectivity of investment decisions compared to an approach used previously. They served as the foundation for drafting methodological recommendations for the adoption of the method by the energy company. © 2021 WITPress. All rights reserved.

The work was supported by Grant of the President of the Russian Federation (МК-4549.2021.2).

Country
Russian Federation
Keywords

ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY, INVESTMENT, EXPERT ASSESSMENT, ENERGY SECTOR, INVESTMENT ANALYSIS, RISKS, INVESTMENT DECISIONS, SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS, PROJECT

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
bronze