
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Novel exploration of hub heights on economics and Weibull distribution methods for wind power potential in Indian sites

doi: 10.2516/stet/2024003
Wind energy is a clean and practical way to create electricity. It necessitates the assessment of Wind Power Potential (WPP) and its economic analysis at different heights. In this context, this study examines WPP assessment for 62 different locations of 12 states in India from 10 m to 150 m height using six methods. The effectiveness of each method was performed through the computation of Relative Power Density Error (RPDE). The results suggested that the best method to estimate the WPP is the Novel Energy Pattern Factor Method (NEPFM) followed by the Empirical Method of Mabchour (EMM), the Empirical Method of Justus (EMJ), and the Empirical Method of Lysen (EML). A technical assessment is also made using six different wind turbine Models, through the computation of their respective capacity factors, annual power, and energy outputs. Furthermore the economic feasibility of these wind turbines gave Cost of Energy (COE) variation from 0.28 to 15.31 $/kWh at 10 m hub height of wind turbine and 150 m hub height of wind turbine COE varies from 0.10 to 3.53 $/kWh. This study is useful for industry.
Technology, cost of energy, weibull, T, Science, Q, economics, wind power density
Technology, cost of energy, weibull, T, Science, Q, economics, wind power density
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).1 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
