
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Competing mechanisms determine oxygen redox in doped Ni-Mn based layered oxides for Na-ion batteries

Competing mechanisms determine oxygen redox in doped Ni-Mn based layered oxides for Na-ion batteries
Cation doping is an effective strategy for improving the cyclability of layered oxide cathode materials through suppression of phase transitions in the high voltage region (>~4.0V). In this study we choose Mg and Sc as representative dopants in P2- Na0.67Ni0.33Mn0.67O2. While both dopants have a positive effect on the cycling stability, they are found to influence the properties in the high voltage regime in different ways. Through a combination of RIXS, XRD, XAS, PDF analysis, and DFT, we show that it is more than just suppression of the P2 to O2 phase transition that is critical for promoting the favorable properties, and that the interplay between Ni and O activity are also critical aspects that dictate the performance. With Mg doping, we could enhance the Ni activity while simultaneously suppressing the O activity. This is surprising because it is in contrast to what has been reported in other Mn-based layered oxides where Mg is known to trigger oxygen redox. We address this contradiction by proposing a competing mechanism between Ni and Mg that impacts differences in O activity in Na0.67MgxNi0.33-xMn0.67O2 (x<0<0.33). These findings provide a new direction in understanding the effects of cation doping on the electrochemical behavior of layered oxides.
info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/660, 660, Electrochemical Energy Storage
info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/660, 660, Electrochemical Energy Storage
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).23 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
