
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Socioeconomic, Community-Based Approach for Developing Integrated Mass Transit Systems: Application to City of Baltimore, Maryland
doi: 10.3141/1793-10
The city of Baltimore, Maryland, is now served by one heavy and one light rail line in addition to commuter rail service to Washington, D.C. However, the lines do not share any common stations and do not function as a network. The larger objective of this research was to evaluate ways in which the Baltimore transit system could be better integrated and contribute more to community well-being, environmental quality, and economic prosperity for all socioeconomic and racial and cultural groups. An underlying goal was to improve the mobility of a wider range of Baltimore residents so that their employment choices would not be limited by an underdeveloped transit system. This outcome was addressed in the context of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century, the Livable Communities Initiative, and the state of Maryland’s Smart Growth initiative. Only part of the larger agenda is presented here—the development of a community-based model for selecting and designing potential light rail line corridors in the larger system. The model used seven quality-of-life and livable community criteria—( a) potential to serve low-to moderate-income neighborhoods that have no direct access to public transportation (including bus access), ( b) high concentrations of employment opportunities along the route, ( c) highest number of intact commercial districts along the route, ( d) proximity to dense population centers (within a ¼-mi radius), ( e) proximity to numerous community social or cultural centers (including schools and churches), ( f) minimal physical environmental impacts, and ( g) the most potential to improve the pedestrian environment.
- Institute of Transport Studies Australia
- Monash University Australia
- Morgan State University United States
- Morgan State University United States
- Institute of Transport Studies Australia
Environmental effects, Improvements, ridership - growth, Social service, Light rail transit, Commercial strips, Culture (Social sciences), mode - tram/light rail, Pedestrian trafficways, operations - traffic, mode - rail, Sustainable development, Mobility, Pedestrian areas, land use - smart growth, Public transit, land use - transit oriented development, policy - sustainable, Access, planning - environmental impact, Sustainability, Auto free zones, Baltimore (Maryland), Low income groups, Transit, Traffic free zones, Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, Socioeconomic development, land use - impacts, Quality of life, Employment, Smart growth, 330, policy - equity, policy - environment, Local transit, Pedestrian precinct, Livable communities, Poverty, mode - mass transit, Mass transit, Transit oriented development, Integrated mass transit systems, Poor people, 380, Livable Communities Initiative, Environmental impacts, land use - urban density, Pedestrian facilities, Population density, Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century, Low income families
Environmental effects, Improvements, ridership - growth, Social service, Light rail transit, Commercial strips, Culture (Social sciences), mode - tram/light rail, Pedestrian trafficways, operations - traffic, mode - rail, Sustainable development, Mobility, Pedestrian areas, land use - smart growth, Public transit, land use - transit oriented development, policy - sustainable, Access, planning - environmental impact, Sustainability, Auto free zones, Baltimore (Maryland), Low income groups, Transit, Traffic free zones, Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, Socioeconomic development, land use - impacts, Quality of life, Employment, Smart growth, 330, policy - equity, policy - environment, Local transit, Pedestrian precinct, Livable communities, Poverty, mode - mass transit, Mass transit, Transit oriented development, Integrated mass transit systems, Poor people, 380, Livable Communities Initiative, Environmental impacts, land use - urban density, Pedestrian facilities, Population density, Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century, Low income families
