
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Selecting Tools for Renewable Energy Analysis in Developing Countries: An Expanded Review

Renewable energy planners in developing countries should be cautious in using analytical tools formulated in developed countries. Traditional energy consumption, economic and demography transitions, high-income inequality, and informal economy are some characteristics of developing countries that may contradict the assumptions of mainstream, widely used analytical tools. In this study, we synthesize the debate in previous review studies on energy models for developing countries and then extend the scope of the previous studies by highlighting emerging methods of system thinking, life cycle thinking, and decision support analysis. We then discuss how these tools have been used for renewable energy analysis in developing countries and found out that not all studies are aware of the emerging critical issues in developing countries. We offer here a guidance to select the most appropriate analytical tool, mainly when dealing with energy modeling and analysis for developing countries. We also suggest potential future improvements to the analytical tool for renewable energy modeling and analysis in the developing countries.
- Hanyang University Korea (Republic of)
- University of Tasmania Australia
- University of Queensland Australia
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of Queensland Australia
- University of Tasmania Australia
690, life cycle thinking, Top-down approach, 2002 Economics and Econometrics, 2102 Energy Engineering and Power Technology, General Works, Developing countries, A, modelling tools, Life cycle thinking, decision support analysis, developing economies, Bottom-up approach, Low carbon transition, low carbon transition, top-down approach, Decision support analysis, Sustainability and the Environment, system thinking, renewable energy, 140205 Environment and Resource Economics, 2105 Renewable Energy, 2103 Fuel Technology, bottom-up approach, System thinking
690, life cycle thinking, Top-down approach, 2002 Economics and Econometrics, 2102 Energy Engineering and Power Technology, General Works, Developing countries, A, modelling tools, Life cycle thinking, decision support analysis, developing economies, Bottom-up approach, Low carbon transition, low carbon transition, top-down approach, Decision support analysis, Sustainability and the Environment, system thinking, renewable energy, 140205 Environment and Resource Economics, 2105 Renewable Energy, 2103 Fuel Technology, bottom-up approach, System thinking
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).36 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
