<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Comparison of the Effects of Pulsed Electric Field Disintegration and Ultrasound Treatment on the Efficiency of Biogas Production from Chicken Manure

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 13 Jul 2023Publisher:MDPI AGJournal:Applied Sciences, volume 13, page 8,154 (eissn: 2076-3417,

Authors: Dawid Szwarc; Anna Nowicka; Marcin Zieliński;

doi: 10.3390/app13148154

Comparison of the Effects of Pulsed Electric Field Disintegration and Ultrasound Treatment on the Efficiency of Biogas Production from Chicken Manure

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

This study used chicken manure classified as lignocellulosic biomass due to its high straw content. This paper compares the possibility of using pulsed electric field (PEF) pretreatment of lignocellulosic substrates with ultrasonic disintegration (UP) to increase methane production. As for ultrasonic treatment, the BMP increased from 210.42 ± 7.92 mL/g VS to 250.06 ± 8.68 mL/g VS, whereas with PEF disintegration, the BMP ratio increased from 210.42 ± 7.92 mL/g VS to 248.90 ± 9.29 mL/g VS. The use of PEF and UP pretreatment increased methane production from 307.29 ± 13.65 mL/g VS to 366.99 ± 14.18 mL/g VS and from 307.29 ± 13.65 mL/g VS to 365.07 ± 11.71 mL/g VS, respectively. This study showed that both ultrasonic treatment and PEF contribute to the biochemical potential of methane (BMP) from chicken manure.

Related Organizations

University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
Poland

Keywords

biogas; anaerobic digestion; lignocellulosic biomass; PEF, anaerobic digestion, Technology, QH301-705.5, T, Physics, QC1-999, PEF, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Chemistry, biogas, TA1-2040, Biology (General), QD1-999, lignocellulosic biomass

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	3
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average