
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Magnetic Field during Wireless Charging in an Electric Vehicle According to Standard SAE J2954

doi: 10.3390/en12091795
handle: 2108/324883 , 11573/1613223 , 11697/137634
Magnetic Field during Wireless Charging in an Electric Vehicle According to Standard SAE J2954
The Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Recommended Practice (RP) J2954 (November 2017) was recently published to standardize the wireless power transfer (WPT) technology to recharge the battery of an electric vehicle (EV). The SAE J2954 RP establishes criteria for interoperability, electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), electromagnetic field (EMF) safety, etc. The aim of this study was to predict the magnetic field behavior inside and outside an EV during wireless charging using the design criteria of SAE RP J2954. Analyzing the worst case configurations of WPT coils and EV bodyshell by a sophisticated software tool based on the finite element method (FEM) that takes into account the field reflection and refraction of the metal EV bodyshell, it is possible to numerically assess the magnetic field levels in the environment. The investigation was performed considering the worst case configuration—a small city car with a Class 2 WPT system of 7.7 kVA with WPT coils with maximum admissible ground clearance and offset. The results showed that the reference level (RL) of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) guidelines in terms of magnetic flux density was exceeded under and beside the EV. To mitigate the magnetic field, the currents flowing through the WPT coils were varied using the inductor-capacitor-capacitor (LCC) compensation instead of the traditional series-series (SS) compensation. The corresponding calculated field was compliant with the 2010 ICNIRP RL and presented a limited exceedance of the 1998 ICNIRP RL. Finally, the influence of the body width on the magnetic field behavior adopting maximum offset was investigated, demonstrating that the magnetic field emission in the environment increased as the ground clearance increased and as the body width decreased.
electric vehicles; electromagnetic compatibility; electromagnetic fields safety; LCC compensation; magnetic field; wireless power transfer, Technology, T, Electric vehicles; Electromagnetic compatibility; Electromagnetic fields safety; LCC compensation; Magnetic field; Wireless power transfer, wireless power transfer, LCC compensation, magnetic field, Electric vehicle, Settore ING-IND/31 - ELETTROTECNICA, 620, electromagnetic fields safety, Magnetic field, Electromagnetic fields safety, Electromagnetic compatibility, Wireless power transfer, Settore IIET-01/A - Elettrotecnica, electromagnetic compatibility, electric vehicles
electric vehicles; electromagnetic compatibility; electromagnetic fields safety; LCC compensation; magnetic field; wireless power transfer, Technology, T, Electric vehicles; Electromagnetic compatibility; Electromagnetic fields safety; LCC compensation; Magnetic field; Wireless power transfer, wireless power transfer, LCC compensation, magnetic field, Electric vehicle, Settore ING-IND/31 - ELETTROTECNICA, 620, electromagnetic fields safety, Magnetic field, Electromagnetic fields safety, Electromagnetic compatibility, Wireless power transfer, Settore IIET-01/A - Elettrotecnica, electromagnetic compatibility, electric vehicles
3 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2016IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).71 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
