
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Low-Carbon Futures for Bioethylene in the United States

doi: 10.3390/en12101958
Low-Carbon Futures for Bioethylene in the United States
The manufacture of the chemical ethylene, a key ingredient in plastics, currently depends on fossil-fuel-derived carbon and generates significant greenhouse gas emissions. Substituting ethylene’s fossil fuel feedstock with alternatives is important for addressing the challenge of global climate change. This paper compares four scenarios for meeting future ethylene supply under differing societal approaches to climate change based on the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. The four scenarios use four perspectives: (1) a sustainability-focused pathway that demands a swift transition to a bioeconomy within 30 years; (2) a regional energy-focused pathway that supports broad biomass use; (3) a fossil-fuel development pathway limited to corn grain; and (4) a fossil-fuel development pathway limited to corn grain and corn stover. Each scenario is developed using the latest scientifically informed future feedstock analyses from the 2016 Billion-Ton report interpreted with perspectives on the future of biomass from recent literature. The intent of this research is to examine how social, economic, and ecological changes determining ethylene supply fit within biophysical boundaries. This new approach to the ethylene feedstocks conundrum finds that phasing out fossil fuels as the main source of U.S. ethylene is possible if current cellulosic ethanol production expands.
Technology, 105904 Environmental research, 207106 Erneuerbare Energie, socio-economic scenarios, 401905 Nachwachsende Rohstoffe, 211908 Energieforschung, 405004 Nachhaltige Landwirtschaft, 211908 Energy research, 401905 Renewable resources, ethylene, 502022 Nachhaltiges Wirtschaften, 405004 Sustainable agriculture, bioeconomy, 502022 Sustainable economics, T, 509, sustainable biomass, 207106 Renewable energy, climate change, 201128 Sustainable building, ethylene; bioeconomy; sustainable biomass; socio-economic scenarios; climate change, 105904 Umweltforschung, 201128 Nachhaltiges Bauen
Technology, 105904 Environmental research, 207106 Erneuerbare Energie, socio-economic scenarios, 401905 Nachwachsende Rohstoffe, 211908 Energieforschung, 405004 Nachhaltige Landwirtschaft, 211908 Energy research, 401905 Renewable resources, ethylene, 502022 Nachhaltiges Wirtschaften, 405004 Sustainable agriculture, bioeconomy, 502022 Sustainable economics, T, 509, sustainable biomass, 207106 Renewable energy, climate change, 201128 Sustainable building, ethylene; bioeconomy; sustainable biomass; socio-economic scenarios; climate change, 105904 Umweltforschung, 201128 Nachhaltiges Bauen
2 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2017IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2015IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).7 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
