
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Hydrate Stability and Methane Recovery from Gas Hydrate through CH4–CO2 Replacement in Different Mass Transfer Scenarios

doi: 10.3390/en12122309
CH4–CO2 replacement is a carbon-negative, safer gas production technique to produce methane gas from natural gas hydrate reservoirs by injecting pure CO2 or other gas mixtures containing CO2. Laboratory-scale experiments show that this technique produces low methane volume and has a slow replacement rate due to the mass transfer barrier created due to impermeable CO2 hydrate layer formation, thus making the process commercially unattractive. This mass-transfer barrier can be reduced through pressure reduction techniques and chemical techniques; however, very few studies have focused on depressurization-assisted and chemical-assisted CH4–CO2 replacement to lower mass-transfer barriers and there are many unknowns. In this work, we qualitatively and quantitatively investigated the effect of the pressure reduction and presence of a hydrate promoter on mixed hydrate stability, CH4 recovery, and risk of water production during CH4–CO2 exchange. Exchange experiments were carried out using the 500 ppm sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) solution inside a high-pressure stirred reactor. Our results indicated that mixed hydrate stability and methane recovery depends on the degree of pressure reduction, type, and composition of injected gas. Final selection between CO2 and CO2 + N2 gas depends on the tradeoff between mixed hydrate stability pressure and methane recovery. Hydrate morphology studies suggest that production of water during the CH4–CO2 exchange is a stochastic phenomenon that is dependent on many parameters.
- Technical University of Denmark Denmark
Technology, methane recovery, T, Morphology studies, Methane recovery, CO + N injection, morphology studies, CO<sub>2</sub> + N<sub>2</sub> injection, hydrate stability, sodium dodecyl sulfate, Hydrate stability, mass transfer, Mass transfer, methane recovery; hydrate stability; CO<sub>2</sub> + N<sub>2</sub> injection; sodium dodecyl sulfate; mass transfer; morphology studies, Sodium dodecyl sulfate
Technology, methane recovery, T, Morphology studies, Methane recovery, CO + N injection, morphology studies, CO<sub>2</sub> + N<sub>2</sub> injection, hydrate stability, sodium dodecyl sulfate, Hydrate stability, mass transfer, Mass transfer, methane recovery; hydrate stability; CO<sub>2</sub> + N<sub>2</sub> injection; sodium dodecyl sulfate; mass transfer; morphology studies, Sodium dodecyl sulfate
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).69 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
