<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

A Preliminary Techno-Economic Comparison between DC Electrification and Trains with On-Board Energy Storage Systems

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal , Other literature type 18 Dec 2020 Italy Publisher:MDPI AGJournal:Energies, volume 13, page 6,702 (eissn: 1996-1073,

Authors: Lamedica R.; Ruvio A.; Tobia M.; Buffarini G. G.; Carones N.;

doi: 10.3390/en13246702

handle: 11573/1551418

A Preliminary Techno-Economic Comparison between DC Electrification and Trains with On-Board Energy Storage Systems

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

The paper presents a preliminary technical-economic comparison between a 3 kV DC railway and the use of trains with on-board storage systems. Numerical simulations have been carried out on a real railway line, which presents an electrified section at 3 kV DC and a non-electrified section, currently covered by diesel-powered trains. Different types of ESS have been analyzed, implementing the models in Matlab/Simulink environment. A preparatory economic investigation has been carried out.

Country

Italy

Related Organizations

Sapienza University of Rome
Italy

Keywords

Technology, catenary-free; energy storage system (ESS); lithium batteries; railway system; simulink; sizing; supercapacitor, Simulink, T, railway system; energy storage system (ESS); lithium batteries; supercapacitor; Simulink; sizing; catenary-free, railway system, lithium batteries, sizing, energy storage system (ESS), supercapacitor

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	16
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%