
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Integrated AHP-TOPSIS under a Fuzzy Environment for the Selection of Waste-To-Energy Technologies in Ghana: A Performance Analysis and Socio-Enviro-Economic Feasibility Study

Energy recovery from waste presents a promising alternative for several countries, including Ghana, which has struggled with unsustainable waste treatment methods and an inadequate power supply for several decades. The current study adopts a comprehensive multi-criteria decision-making approach for the selection of an optimal waste-to-energy (WtE) technology for implementation in Ghana. Four WtE technologies are evaluated against twelve selection criteria. An integrated AHP-fuzzy TOPSIS method is applied to estimate the criteria’s weights and rank the WtE alternatives. From the AHP results, technical criteria obtained the highest priority weight, while social criteria emerged as the least important in the selection process. The overall ranking order of WtE technologies obtained by fuzzy TOPSIS is as follows: anaerobic digestion > gasification > pyrolysis > plasma gasification. The sensitivity analysis indicates highly consistent and sturdy results regarding the optimal selection. This study recommends adopting a hybrid system of anaerobic digestion and gasification technologies, as this offers a well-balanced system under all of the evaluation criteria compared to the standalone systems. The results of the current study may help the government of Ghana and other prospective investors select a suitable WtE technology, and could serve as an index system for future WtE research in Ghana.
- University of Technology Sydney Australia
- Cardiff University United Kingdom
- Green Technology Center Korea (Republic of)
- Tianjin University China (People's Republic of)
- Tianjin University China (People's Republic of)
Technology, FUZZY MATHEMATICS, MULTICRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, AHP, ANAEROBIC DIGESTION, Ghana, NUMERICAL MODEL, Waste Management, MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE (MSW), Prospective Studies, PROSPECTIVE STUDY, ZERO WASTE, FEASIBILITY STUDY, FEASIBILITY STUDIES, HUMAN, IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS, Refuse Disposal, GHANA, WASTE TREATMENT, GOVERNMENT, MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING (MCDM), AHP; circular economy; fuzzy TOPSIS; multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM); municipal solid waste (MSW); waste-to-energy (WtE); zero waste, CIRCULAR ECONOMY, ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS, Article, ECONOMIC ASPECT, SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS, TECHNOLOGY, ARTICLE, MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE, REFUSE DISPOSAL, PYROLYSIS, WASTE-TO-ENERGY, TECHNIQUE FOR ORDER PREFERENCE BY SIMILARITY TO IDEAL SOLUTION, GASIFICATION, PROSPECTIVE STUDIES, WASTE MANAGEMENT, WASTE-TO-ENERGY (WTE), HUMAN TISSUE, PROCEDURES, WASTE TECHNOLOGY, WASTE DISPOSAL, Feasibility Studies, FUZZY TOPSIS
Technology, FUZZY MATHEMATICS, MULTICRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, AHP, ANAEROBIC DIGESTION, Ghana, NUMERICAL MODEL, Waste Management, MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE (MSW), Prospective Studies, PROSPECTIVE STUDY, ZERO WASTE, FEASIBILITY STUDY, FEASIBILITY STUDIES, HUMAN, IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS, Refuse Disposal, GHANA, WASTE TREATMENT, GOVERNMENT, MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING (MCDM), AHP; circular economy; fuzzy TOPSIS; multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM); municipal solid waste (MSW); waste-to-energy (WtE); zero waste, CIRCULAR ECONOMY, ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS, Article, ECONOMIC ASPECT, SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS, TECHNOLOGY, ARTICLE, MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE, REFUSE DISPOSAL, PYROLYSIS, WASTE-TO-ENERGY, TECHNIQUE FOR ORDER PREFERENCE BY SIMILARITY TO IDEAL SOLUTION, GASIFICATION, PROSPECTIVE STUDIES, WASTE MANAGEMENT, WASTE-TO-ENERGY (WTE), HUMAN TISSUE, PROCEDURES, WASTE TECHNOLOGY, WASTE DISPOSAL, Feasibility Studies, FUZZY TOPSIS
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).19 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
