
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Conductive Carbon Materials from the Hydrothermal Carbonization of Vineyard Residues for the Application in Electrochemical Double-Layer Capacitors (EDLCs) and Direct Carbon Fuel Cells (DCFCs)

Conductive Carbon Materials from the Hydrothermal Carbonization of Vineyard Residues for the Application in Electrochemical Double-Layer Capacitors (EDLCs) and Direct Carbon Fuel Cells (DCFCs)
This study investigates the production of bio-based carbon materials for energy storage and conversion devices based on two different vineyard residues (pruning, pomace) and cellulose as a model biomass. Three different char categories were produced via pyrolysis at 900 °C for 2 h (biochars, BC), hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) (at 220, 240 or 260 °C) with different reaction times (60, 120 or 300 min) (hydrochars, HC), or HTC plus pyrolysis (pyrolyzed hydrochars, PHC). Physicochemical, structural, and electrical properties of the chars were assessed by elemental and proximate analysis, gas adsorption surface analysis with N2 and CO2, compression ratio, bulk density, and electrical conductivity (EC) measurements. Thermogravimetric analysis allowed conclusions to be made about the thermochemical conversion processes. Taking into consideration the required material properties for the application in electrochemical double-layer capacitors (EDLC) or in a direct carbon fuel cell (DCFC), the suitability of the obtained materials for each application is discussed. Promising materials with surface areas up to 711 m2 g−1 and presence of microporosity have been produced. It is shown that HTC plus pyrolysis from cellulose and pruning leads to better properties regarding aromatic carbon structures, carbon content (>90 wt.%), EC (up to 179 S m−1), and porosity compared to one-step treatments, resulting in suitable materials for an EDLC application. The one-step pyrolysis process and the resulting chars with lower carbon contents and low EC values between 51 and 56 S m−1 are preferred for DCFC applications. To conclude, biomass potentials can be exploited by producing tailored biomass-derived carbon materials via different carbonization processes for a wide range of applications in the field of energy storage and conversion.
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Germany
- Research Institute of Technology (Russia) Russian Federation
- University of Sfax Tunisia
- University of Hohenheim Germany
- Digital Research Centre of Sfax Tunisia
Technology, ddc:600, direct carbon fuel cell, grape pomace, bio-based carbon materials, Article, hydrothermal carbonization, supercapacitor, Microscopy, QC120-168.85, electrical conductivity, energy storage, T, vine pruning, QH201-278.5, 600, 540, pyrolysis, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), 620, TK1-9971, advanced carbon materials, Descriptive and experimental mechanics, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/600, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, TA1-2040
Technology, ddc:600, direct carbon fuel cell, grape pomace, bio-based carbon materials, Article, hydrothermal carbonization, supercapacitor, Microscopy, QC120-168.85, electrical conductivity, energy storage, T, vine pruning, QH201-278.5, 600, 540, pyrolysis, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), 620, TK1-9971, advanced carbon materials, Descriptive and experimental mechanics, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/600, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, TA1-2040
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).53 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
