Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Sustainabilityarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Sustainability
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Two Types of Flexible Plastic Packaging under a Sustainable Circular Economy Approach

Authors: Börçe Tunçok-Çeşme; Eren Yıldız-Geyhan; Gökçen Alev Çiftçioğlu;

Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Two Types of Flexible Plastic Packaging under a Sustainable Circular Economy Approach

Abstract

While it is of great importance to evaluate plastic waste within the framework of a circular economy today, it is also of great importance to evaluate flexible plastic packaging, which is increasingly used in order to prevent environmental problems. To avoid the disadvantages experienced in recycling due to its multilayer nature, in this study, a life cycle assessment was made for flexible packages consisting of PET/metallized PET/PE and PP/metallized PP/PP with the data provided by the R&D Center of Elif Plastik Ambalaj Sanayi ve Tic. A.Ş.-Huhtamaki Flexibles Istanbul. Within the scope of this evaluation, two types of flexible packaging were analyzed, and an optimal flexible packaging structure for Türkiye was revealed by comparing different scenarios based on different methods in SimaPro 8.1.1.16. LCA was performed for both packages with cumulative energy demand (CED) and CML-IA methods. Four scenarios with different amounts of recycled raw materials were compared against the existing system and a fifth scenario, where electricity is assumed to be obtained from solar energy. Overall, we found that the largest environmental impact was in the existing system. However, despite being a renewable energy source, we observed that the solar energy scenario had almost as significant an impact as the existing system. When scenarios involving recycled raw materials were examined, we clearly observed that as the amount of recycled raw materials increased, the environmental impact decreased. Therefore, it emerged that the scenario with the highest amount of recycled raw materials is the most optimal scenario in many respects. There are clear differences in the results due to differences in plastic types. This study, conducted with real data, is highly important for the flexible packaging literature. A table has been provided for changing the type of plastic, changing the source of electricity generation, and reducing waste by using recycled raw materials in order to make flexible packaging more environmentally beneficial.

Country
Turkey
Related Organizations
Keywords

Social Sciences and Humanities, Social Sciences (SOC), Tarımsal Bilimler, Sosyal Bilimler ve Beşeri Bilimler, Geography, Planning and Development, Temel Bilimler (SCI), Mühendislik, Enerji Mühendisliği ve Güç Teknolojisi, ENGINEERING, Yerbilimleri, Çevre / Ekoloji, Ziraat, Information Systems, Communication and Control Engineering, Sociology, ENERGY & FUELS, Computer Science (miscellaneous), Tarım ve Çevre Bilimleri (AGE), Geography, Agricultural Sciences, Computer Sciences, LCA, ENERJİ VE YAKITLAR, Tarımda Enerji, Agriculture, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, sustainability, ÇEVRE ÇALIŞMALARI, Energy in Agriculture, Bilgisayar Bilimi (çeşitli), Hardware and Architecture, Natural Sciences (SCI), Physical Sciences, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, Engineering and Technology, Sosyal Bilimler (SOC), Bilgisayar Bilimi, ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, Biofuels Technology, BİLGİSAYAR BİLİMİ, DONANIM VE MİMARLIK, Bilgi Sistemleri, Haberleşme ve Kontrol Mühendisliği, ÇEVRE BİLİMLERİ, Bilgisayar Ağları ve İletişim, Yönetim, İzleme, Politika ve Hukuk, Environmental Engineering, GEOSCIENCES, Computer Networks and Communications, SOCIAL SCIENCES, GENERAL, GEOGRAPHY, Farm Machinery, Equipment, Energy Engineering and Power Technology, ENVIRONMENT/ECOLOGY, Environmental Science (miscellaneous), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, SimaPro, Coğrafya, Planlama ve Geliştirme, COĞRAFYA, Biyoyakıt Teknolojisi, Coğrafya, Çevre Bilimi (çeşitli), Donanım ve Mimari, life cycle assessment, Tarım Makineleri, Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler, Bilgisayar Bilimleri, Social Sciences & Humanities, Donanım, Engineering, Computing & Technology (ENG), Sosyoloji, Yenilenebilir Enerji, Sürdürülebilirlik ve Çevre, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, circular economy, Mühendislik, Bilişim ve Teknoloji (ENG), Agriculture & Environment Sciences (AGE), Sosyal Bilimler Genel, COMPUTER SCIENCE, Çevre Mühendisliği, Fizik Bilimleri, COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE, environmental life cycle assessment (ELCA), flexible packaging, Mühendislik ve Teknoloji, TELEKOMÜNİKASYON

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Green
gold
Related to Research communities
Energy Research