
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Cooperation or Competition? Channel Choice for a Remanufacturing Fashion Supply Chain with Government Subsidy

doi: 10.3390/su6107292
handle: 10397/36286
In this paper, we address the problem of choosing an appropriate channel for the marketing channel structure of remanufactured fashion products. To be specific, we consider a remanufacturer who has two options for selling the products: (1) provide the remanufactured products to a manufacturer, then the manufacturer sells both new products and the remanufactured products to customers, and (2) sell the remanufactured products directly to customers. Because of the relatively low acceptance of remanufactured products and environment consciousness of customers in developing countries like China, we model the two scenarios as decentralized remanufacturing supply chains, with the manufacturer being the Stackelberg leader and the government offering subsidy to the remanufacturer to incentivize remanufacturing activities. We find that the subsidy can incentivize remanufacturing activity regardless of the remanufacturer’s channel choice. A “too high” or “too low” subsidy makes the remanufacturer compete with the manufacturer, and an intermediate subsidy results in cooperation between the two members of the remanufacturing supply chain. Meanwhile, if the customers’ acceptance for remanufactured products is higher, the remanufacturer will be more likely to compete with the manufacturer. However, the remanufacturer’s optimal channel choice may be inefficient in the sense of social welfare and environmental protection.
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University China (People's Republic of)
- Lanzhou University China (People's Republic of)
- Chongqing University China (People's Republic of)
- Chongqing University China (People's Republic of)
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University (香港理工大學) China (People's Republic of)
closed-loop supply chain, cooperation, TJ807-830, fashion business operations, Fashion business operations, TD194-195, Renewable energy sources, remanufacturing supply chain; fashion business operations; closed-loop supply chain; government subsidy; channel choice; cooperation; competition, Closed-loop supply chain, Channel choice, GE1-350, Government subsidy, Remanufacturing supply chain, remanufacturing supply chain, Competition, Environmental effects of industries and plants, Environmental sciences, Cooperation, government subsidy, competition, channel choice, jel: jel:Q, jel: jel:Q0, jel: jel:Q2, jel: jel:Q3, jel: jel:Q5, jel: jel:O13, jel: jel:Q56
closed-loop supply chain, cooperation, TJ807-830, fashion business operations, Fashion business operations, TD194-195, Renewable energy sources, remanufacturing supply chain; fashion business operations; closed-loop supply chain; government subsidy; channel choice; cooperation; competition, Closed-loop supply chain, Channel choice, GE1-350, Government subsidy, Remanufacturing supply chain, remanufacturing supply chain, Competition, Environmental effects of industries and plants, Environmental sciences, Cooperation, government subsidy, competition, channel choice, jel: jel:Q, jel: jel:Q0, jel: jel:Q2, jel: jel:Q3, jel: jel:Q5, jel: jel:O13, jel: jel:Q56
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).89 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
