
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Comparative assessment for biogenic carbon accounting methods in carbon footprint of products: a review study for construction materials based on forest products

The forest and building sector is of major importance in climate change mitigation and therefore construction materials based on forest products are of great interest. While energy efficiency has had a large focus in climate change mitigation in the building sector, the carbon footprint of the construction material is gaining relevance. The carbon footprint of construction materials can vary greatly from one type to another, the building sector is consequently demanding documentation of the carbon footprint of the materials used. Using an environmental product declaration (EPD) is an objective and standardised solution for communicating the environmental impacts of construction products and especially their carbon footprint. Nevertheless, it is challenging to include the features of forest products as pools of carbon dioxide. There is currently a focus on research into methods for the accounting of sequestered atmospheric carbon dioxide and also implementation of these methods into technical standards. This paper reviews the recent research and technical standards in this field to promote a common understanding and to propose requirements for additional information to be included in EPDs of forest-based products. The main findings show the need for reporting the contribution of biogenic carbon to the total on greenhouse gas emissions and removals over the product’s lifecycle. In order to facilitate the implementation of more advanced methods from research, the EPD should also include more detailed information of the wood used, in particular species and origin.
iForest, 10 (5)
ISSN:1971-7458
- University of Aveiro Portugal
- University of Zurich Switzerland
- Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research Norway
- University of Aveiro Portugal
- NTI University Netherlands
Climate Change, Forest Based Construction Materials, Delayed emissions, Global Warming, Center for Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability, Forest based construction materials, Biogenic carbon, Climate change, Biogenic Carbon, Carbon Footprint, Climate change; Forest based construction materials; Environmental product declaration (EPD); Carbon footprint; Global warming; Delayed emissions; Carbon storage; Biogenic carbon, Delayed Emissions, Global warming, Carbon Storage, Forestry, SD1-669.5, Carbon footprint, 330 Economics, Carbon storage, Environmental Product Declaration (EPD), Environmental product declaration (EPD)
Climate Change, Forest Based Construction Materials, Delayed emissions, Global Warming, Center for Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability, Forest based construction materials, Biogenic carbon, Climate change, Biogenic Carbon, Carbon Footprint, Climate change; Forest based construction materials; Environmental product declaration (EPD); Carbon footprint; Global warming; Delayed emissions; Carbon storage; Biogenic carbon, Delayed Emissions, Global warming, Carbon Storage, Forestry, SD1-669.5, Carbon footprint, 330 Economics, Carbon storage, Environmental Product Declaration (EPD), Environmental product declaration (EPD)
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).43 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
