Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao CNR ExploRAarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
CNR ExploRA
Article . 1995
Data sources: CNR ExploRA
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
IRIS Cnr
Article . 1995
Data sources: IRIS Cnr
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
https://doi.org/10.4271/950057...
Conference object . 1995 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Comparison Between Lean-Burn and Stoichiometric Technologies for CNG Heavy-Duty Engines

Authors: Corbo P; Gambino M; Iannaccone S; Unich A;

Comparison Between Lean-Burn and Stoichiometric Technologies for CNG Heavy-Duty Engines

Abstract

Natural gas is a viable alternative fuel to obtain low exhaust emissions. A heavy duty DI diesel engine was converted to Otto cycle natural gas operation. Two alternative solutions were compared: lean burn technology and stoichiometric feed with three-way catalyst and EGR. Power and efficiency were similar for the two above solutions, and exhaust temperature resulted similar to the diesel engine in both cases due to the diluted operation. The lean burn engine met EURO II ECE-R49 limits except for total hydrocarbons. Stoichiometric engine emissions resulted much lower than the limits. Particulate emissions were quite negligible for the two solutions.

Country
Italy
Keywords

Lean burn engine, combustion chamber, compressed natural gas engine

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback