
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Evaluation of Nitrogen Fertilization and Genotype Effects on Lodging of Miscanthus and Switchgrass
Energy grasses for use as solid fuels are harvested after winter, i.e. in early spring. But in regions with early snow, lodging is a major risk leading to quality and yield losses. Visual lodging assessment was conducted to evaluate genotypic effects and effects of nitrogen fertilization on lodging susceptibility of miscanthus and switchgrass after heavy snowfall. In a comparison of 15 miscanthus genotypes, strong differences in lodging behaviour were observed. All M. x sinensis genotypes and M. x sinensis hybrids showed high lodging damage. Greatest resistance to lodging was observed in the genotype M. x sacchariflorus (score of 5.33) and M. x giganteus (scores of 5.00 and 3.33). The level of nitrogen fertilizer only had an effect on the lodging susceptibility of switchgrass, where lodging increased with each increment in nitrogen level. No influence of nitrogen fertilization was observed on the lodging behaviour of M. x giganteus. It was concluded that the selection of lodging resistant genotypes of miscanthus and adapted nitrogen fertilization regimes in switchgrass can become important factors for securing biomass supply from energy grasses in colder regions where early snow fall frequently occurs.
Proceedings of the 19th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, 6-10 June 2011, Berlin, Germany, pp. 619-622
Biomass
Biomass
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).1 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
