
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Global Carbon Budget 2017

Abstract. Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere – the "global carbon budget" – is important to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe data sets and methodology to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. CO2 emissions from fossil fuels and industry (EFF) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, respectively, while emissions from land-use change (ELUC), mainly deforestation, are based on land-cover change data and bookkeeping models. The global atmospheric CO2 concentration is measured directly and its rate of growth (GATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO2 sink (SOCEAN) and terrestrial CO2 sink (SLAND) are estimated with global process models constrained by observations. The resulting carbon budget imbalance (BIM), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of our imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1σ. For the last decade available (2007–2016), EFF was 9.4 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1, ELUC 1.3 ± 0.7 GtC yr−1, GATM 4.7 ± 0.1 GtC yr−1, SOCEAN 2.4 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1, and SLAND 3.0 ± 0.8 GtC yr−1, with a budget imbalance BIM of 0.6 GtC yr−1 indicating overestimated emissions and/or underestimated sinks. For year 2016 alone, the growth in EFF was approximately zero and emissions remained at 9.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1. Also for 2016, ELUC was 1.3 ± 0.7 GtC yr−1, GATM was 6.1 ± 0.2 GtC yr−1, SOCEAN was 2.6 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 and SLAND was 2.7 ± 1.0 GtC yr−1, with a small BIM of −0.3 GtC. GATM continued to be higher in 2016 compared to the past decade (2007–2016), reflecting in part the higher fossil emissions and smaller SLAND for that year consistent with El Niño conditions. The global atmospheric CO2 concentration reached 402.8 ± 0.1 ppm averaged over 2016. For 2017, preliminary data indicate a renewed growth in EFF of +2.0 % (range of 0.8 % to 3.0 %) based on national emissions projections for China, USA, and India, and projections of Gross Domestic Product corrected for recent changes in the carbon intensity of the economy for the rest of the world. For 2017, initial data indicate an increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration of around 5.3 GtC (2.5 ppm), attributed to a combination of increasing emissions and receding El Niño conditions. This living data update documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new global carbon budget compared with previous publications of this data set (Le Quéré et al., 2016; 2015b; 2015a; 2014; 2013). All results presented here can be downloaded from https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2017.
- University of Colorado System United States
- Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis Canada
- Free University of Amsterdam Pure VU Amsterdam Netherlands
- Met Office United Kingdom
- University of Maryland, College Park United States
Meteorologie en Luchtkwaliteit, ENVIRONMENT SIMULATOR JULES, 550, Meteorology and Air Quality, 530 Physics, [PHYS.PHYS.PHYS-GEO-PH] Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]/Geophysics [physics.geo-ph], MIXED-LAYER SCHEME, Earth and Planetary Sciences(all), [PHYS.PHYS.PHYS-GEO-PH]Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]/Geophysics [physics.geo-ph], CO2 emissions, INTERNATIONAL-TRADE, 333, carbon budget, Bacteriology & Epidemiology, FOSSIL-FUEL COMBUSTION, ANTHROPOGENIC CO2 UPTAKE, SDG 13 - Climate Action, Life Science, Bacteriologie & Epidemiologie, GE1-350, SDG 14 - Life Below Water, ATMOSPHERIC CO2, DIOXIDE EMISSIONS, SDG 15 - Life on Land, QE1-996.5, CVI Bacteriology and Epidemiology, LAND-COVER CHANGE, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/550, WIMEK, anthropogenic carbon dioxide, EARTH SYSTEM MODEL, ddc:550, VEGETATION MODEL, Geology, Environmental sciences, Earth sciences, General Earth and Planetary Sciences, CVI Bacteriologie en Epidemiologie
Meteorologie en Luchtkwaliteit, ENVIRONMENT SIMULATOR JULES, 550, Meteorology and Air Quality, 530 Physics, [PHYS.PHYS.PHYS-GEO-PH] Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]/Geophysics [physics.geo-ph], MIXED-LAYER SCHEME, Earth and Planetary Sciences(all), [PHYS.PHYS.PHYS-GEO-PH]Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]/Geophysics [physics.geo-ph], CO2 emissions, INTERNATIONAL-TRADE, 333, carbon budget, Bacteriology & Epidemiology, FOSSIL-FUEL COMBUSTION, ANTHROPOGENIC CO2 UPTAKE, SDG 13 - Climate Action, Life Science, Bacteriologie & Epidemiologie, GE1-350, SDG 14 - Life Below Water, ATMOSPHERIC CO2, DIOXIDE EMISSIONS, SDG 15 - Life on Land, QE1-996.5, CVI Bacteriology and Epidemiology, LAND-COVER CHANGE, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/550, WIMEK, anthropogenic carbon dioxide, EARTH SYSTEM MODEL, ddc:550, VEGETATION MODEL, Geology, Environmental sciences, Earth sciences, General Earth and Planetary Sciences, CVI Bacteriologie en Epidemiologie
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).1K popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 0.1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.01%
