
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
FOREST COVER MAPPING IN ISKANDAR MALAYSIA USING SATELLITE DATA

FOREST COVER MAPPING IN ISKANDAR MALAYSIA USING SATELLITE DATA
Abstract. Malaysia is the third largest country in the world that had lost forest cover. Therefore, timely information on forest cover is required to help the government to ensure that the remaining forest resources are managed in a sustainable manner. This study aims to map and detect changes of forest cover (deforestation and disturbance) in Iskandar Malaysia region in the south of Peninsular Malaysia between years 1990 and 2010 using Landsat satellite images. The Carnegie Landsat Analysis System-Lite (CLASlite) programme was used to classify forest cover using Landsat images. This software is able to mask out clouds, cloud shadows, terrain shadows, and water bodies and atmospherically correct the images using 6S radiative transfer model. An Automated Monte Carlo Unmixing technique embedded in CLASlite was used to unmix each Landsat pixel into fractions of photosynthetic vegetation (PV), non photosynthetic vegetation (NPV) and soil surface (S). Forest and non-forest areas were produced from the fractional cover images using appropriate threshold values of PV, NPV and S. CLASlite software was found to be able to classify forest cover in Iskandar Malaysia with only a difference between 14% (1990) and 5% (2010) compared to the forest land use map produced by the Department of Agriculture, Malaysia. Nevertheless, the CLASlite automated software used in this study was found not to exclude other vegetation types especially rubber and oil palm that has similar reflectance to forest. Currently rubber and oil palm were discriminated from forest manually using land use maps. Therefore, CLASlite algorithm needs further adjustment to exclude these vegetation and classify only forest cover.
- Universiti Teknologi MARA Malaysia
- University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus Malaysia
- Nottingham Trent University United Kingdom
- Universiti Teknologi MARA Malaysia
- University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus Malaysia
Cartography, Technology, Land cover, Thematic Mapper, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, Environmental science, Cloud cover, Pathology, Cloud computing, Climate change, Applied optics. Photonics, Biology, Terrain, Global and Planetary Change, Global Analysis of Ecosystem Services and Land Use, Ecology, Geography, T, Satellite imagery, Forestry, Remote Sensing in Vegetation Monitoring and Phenology, Remote sensing, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Computer science, TA1501-1820, Programming language, Operating system, Deforestation (computer science), FOS: Biological sciences, Environmental Science, Physical Sciences, Land use, Medicine, TA1-2040, Drivers and Impacts of Tropical Deforestation, Landsat, Vegetation (pathology)
Cartography, Technology, Land cover, Thematic Mapper, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, Environmental science, Cloud cover, Pathology, Cloud computing, Climate change, Applied optics. Photonics, Biology, Terrain, Global and Planetary Change, Global Analysis of Ecosystem Services and Land Use, Ecology, Geography, T, Satellite imagery, Forestry, Remote Sensing in Vegetation Monitoring and Phenology, Remote sensing, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Computer science, TA1501-1820, Programming language, Operating system, Deforestation (computer science), FOS: Biological sciences, Environmental Science, Physical Sciences, Land use, Medicine, TA1-2040, Drivers and Impacts of Tropical Deforestation, Landsat, Vegetation (pathology)
11 Research products, page 1 of 2
- 2016IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2015IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2018IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2021IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2018IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2017IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
chevron_left - 1
- 2
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).3 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
