
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
[Measurements of proton response of two lithium fluoride detectors with different thicknesses].

To study the response characteristics of LiF detectors to proton fluence rate and energy, and to observe the thickness effect of the detector.Protons were generated by an accelerator. Proton energy was changed in two ways, i.e. changing the accelerator energy directly, or using detector stacks to absorb the proton energy. The incident proton energy on each chip of detector stacks was calculated according to proton range in LiF.The response of the detector to proton fluence rate was almost constant; when proton energy was above 9 MeV, the response of the detector to proton energy was constant (less than 10% errors). When proton energy was below 9 MeV, the response reduced gradually with the decrease of proton energy. Thickness effect for LiF thicknesses of 0.4mm and 0.8mm was not obvious.The homemade LiF detector is suitable for measurement of space radiation dose. When proton component (below 9 MeV) was abundant in radiation field, the decrease of the relative thermoluminescence efficiency should be taken into consideration.
Fluorides, Lithium Compounds, Linear Energy Transfer, Thermoluminescent Dosimetry, Protons, Cosmic Radiation
Fluorides, Lithium Compounds, Linear Energy Transfer, Thermoluminescent Dosimetry, Protons, Cosmic Radiation
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
