Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

EFECTO DE TRES SISTEMAS DE MANEJO DE SUELO EN LA EFICIENCIA FISIOLÓGICA DE USO DE NITRÓGENO FERTILIZANTE EN TRIGO (Effect of three soil tillage systems on physiological nitrogen use efficiency in wheat crop)

Authors: Juan Luis Rouanet M.; Inés Pino; Ana María Parada; Adriana Nario;

EFECTO DE TRES SISTEMAS DE MANEJO DE SUELO EN LA EFICIENCIA FISIOLÓGICA DE USO DE NITRÓGENO FERTILIZANTE EN TRIGO (Effect of three soil tillage systems on physiological nitrogen use efficiency in wheat crop)

Abstract

Nitrogen fertilization is the most costly production factor in wheat cropping systems on Ultisols, one of the most eroded soil types in Southern Chile. The utilization efficiency of N-fertilizer was assessed in a wheat cultivar ( Triticum aestivum L.) growing under three soil tillage systems: Traditional, burning of crop residues/soil plow down (TRAD); no-till/burning (CL+Q), and no-till/no burning (CL-Q). The method used measurements of grain yield, total N uptake by plants and their components: N derived from fertilizer (Nddf) and N derived from soil (Ndds). Physiological N use efficiency, was evaluated for total plant N (EFNt = grain yield/Nddf +Ndds) and for N-fertilizer in plants (EFNf = grain yields/N-fertilizer). 15 N-labelled urea, 10 % atom excess (a.e.) was added to the microplots at the rate of 150 kg N ha -1 . The fertilizer was applied three times: 10% at planting, 45% at tilling and 45% at jointing stage. There were no significant seasonal differences for wheat grain yield among tillage treatments with yield of 6.7 to 7.5 t ha -1 on 1997/1998 and 4.6 to 5.4 t ha -1 on 1998/99 season. The treatments CL+Q in 1997/1998 and TRAD in 1998/1999 had the highest total N uptake. The CL-Q treatment showed lowest N-fertilizer uptake by plants for each season, while keeping similar grain yields as the other two tillage systems. This led to higher physiological nitrogen use efficiency on grain production per unit of N-fertilizer absorbed by plants.

Country
Canada
Related Organizations
Keywords

soil tillage, fertilization, 15N., wheat, manejo de suelos, sustentabilidad, sustainability, trigo, 15N isotopic technique, técnicas isotópicas, 630, fertilización

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average