Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Hardware-assisted power estimation for design-stage processors using FPGA emulation

Authors: Holger Blume; Sebastian Hesselbarth; Tim Baumgart;

Hardware-assisted power estimation for design-stage processors using FPGA emulation

Abstract

This paper presents the application of an accurate power estimation model for design-stage processors that can be mapped onto an FPGA together with the functional emulation. Based on a hybrid functional level power analysis (FLPA) and instruction level power analysis (ILPA) approach, the model enables the estimation of application-specific power consumption and energy per task at very early design stages of programmable embedded processors. The extremely short execution time of the emulated power model compared to gate-transfer level (GTL) power simulation allows both hardware and software designers to constantly optimize their implementations for low-power iteratively in different design stages. The power consumption modeling methodology used for this work and necessary considerations for FPGA implementation are described. The presented model is validated against GTL power simulation with respect to execution time and precision by benchmarking for an exemplary embedded RISC processor core, the LEON2. Benchmarking results yield a percentage mean absolute error (%MAE) of less than 9% and normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of less than 6% while reducing power estimation time from several hours down to a few milliseconds. Finally, a case-study with varying real-world input data sizes has been performed on different software implementations of JPEG encoder and decoder applications and optimized processor core. With software and hardware optimizations applied, required energy per task has been reduced by up to 46% for the JPEG encoder and 39% for the JPEG decoder, demonstrating the advantage of the presented approach.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average