
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
The interspecific biomass–density relationship for terrestrial plants: where do clonal red seaweeds stand and why?

The interspecific biomass–density relationship for terrestrial plants: where do clonal red seaweeds stand and why?
For crowded stands of terrestrial plants, ranging from mosses to trees, plant (or ramet, for clonal plants) density is negatively related to stand biomass. Stand biomass and ramet density were determined for Mazzaella cornucopiae and for Pterocladiella capillacea, two morphologically distinct intertidal clonal red seaweeds, to compare them with terrestrial plants. For these seaweeds, ramet densities were similar to the highest values reported for terrestrial plants (mosses, specifically). Stand biomass was higher than average values expected from the terrestrial interspecific biomass–density relationship, but lower than the limits expected from the terrestrial ultimate biomass–density line. These seaweeds show unexpectedly low ramet slenderness and high biomass packing per unit of volume, compared with the trend observed for terrestrial plants. Possible explanations for these differences are related to the particular physiology and habitat of intertidal clonal seaweeds.
8 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2013IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2010IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2012IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2012IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2011IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).30 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
